Abduction and Dialogical Proof in Argumentation and Logic Programming
Artificial Intelligence
2014-07-16 v1 Logic in Computer Science
Abstract
We develop a model of abduction in abstract argumentation, where changes to an argumentation framework act as hypotheses to explain the support of an observation. We present dialogical proof theories for the main decision problems (i.e., finding hypothe- ses that explain skeptical/credulous support) and we show that our model can be instantiated on the basis of abductive logic programs.
Cite
@article{arxiv.1407.3896,
title = {Abduction and Dialogical Proof in Argumentation and Logic Programming},
author = {Richard Booth and Dov Gabbay and Souhila Kaci and Tjitze Rienstra and Leendert van der Torre},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1407.3896},
year = {2014}
}
Comments
Appears in the Proceedings of the 15th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR 2014)