English

An $(\aleph_0,k+2)$-Theorem for $k$-Transversals

Combinatorics 2025-10-17 v2 Computational Geometry

Abstract

A family F\mathcal{F} of sets satisfies the (p,q)(p,q)-property if among every pp members of F\mathcal{F}, some qq can be pierced by a single point. The celebrated (p,q)(p,q)-theorem of Alon and Kleitman asserts that for any pqd+1p \geq q \geq d+1, any family F\mathcal{F} of compact convex sets in Rd\mathbb{R}^d that satisfies the (p,q)(p,q)-property can be pierced by a finite number c(p,q,d)c(p,q,d) of points. A similar theorem with respect to piercing by (d1)(d-1)-dimensional flats, called (d1)(d-1)-transversals, was obtained by Alon and Kalai. In this paper we prove the following result, which can be viewed as an (0,k+2)(\aleph_0,k+2)-theorem with respect to kk-transversals: Let F\mathcal{F} be an infinite family of closed balls in Rd\mathbb{R}^d, and let 0k<d0 \leq k < d. If among every 0\aleph_0 elements of F\mathcal{F}, some k+2k+2 can be pierced by a kk-dimensional flat, then F\mathcal{F} can be pierced by a finite number of kk-dimensional flats. We derive this result as a corollary of a more general result which proves the same assertion for families of not necessarily convex objects called \emph{near-balls}, to be defined below. This is the first (p,q)(p,q)-theorem in which the assumption is weakened to an (,)(\infty,\cdot) assumption. Our proofs combine geometric and topological tools.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2306.02181,
  title  = {An $(\aleph_0,k+2)$-Theorem for $k$-Transversals},
  author = {Chaya Keller and Micha A. Perles},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.02181},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

18 pages, 6 figures. To appear in Israel J. Math

R2 v1 2026-06-28T10:55:33.684Z