English

ABC implies that Ramanujan's tau function misses almost all primes

Number Theory 2026-04-28 v3

Abstract

Lehmer conjectured that Ramanujan's tau-function never vanishes. In a related direction, a folklore conjecture asserts that infinitely many primes arise as absolute values of Ramanujan's tau-function. Recently, Xiong showed that these prime values form a subset of the primes with density at most 2/112/11. Assuming the abcabc Conjecture, we prove the stronger upper bound S(X):=#{X:  prime and τ(n)= for some n1}=O(X13/22), S(X):=\#\{\ell\le X:\ \ell\ \text{prime and } |\tau(n)|=\ell \text{ for some } n\ge 1\} = O(X^{13/22}), which implies that Ramanujan's tau-function misses a density 1 subset of the primes. We give a heuristic suggesting that S(X)S(X) should nevertheless be infinite, with predicted order of magnitude S(X)CX111(logX)2. S(X)\asymp \frac{C X^{\frac{1}{11}}}{(\log X)^2}. The main engine in this note was formalized and produced automatically in Lean/Mathlib by AxiomProver from a natural-language statement of the problem.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2603.29970,
  title  = {ABC implies that Ramanujan's tau function misses almost all primes},
  author = {David Kurniadi Angdinata and Evan Chen and Chris Cummins and Ben Eltschig and Dejan Grubisic and Leopold Haller and Letong Hong and Andranik Kurghinyan and Kenny Lau and Hugh Leather and Seewoo Lee and Simon Mahns and Aram H. Markosyan and Rithikesh Muddana and Ken Ono and Manooshree Patel and Gaurang Pendharkar and Vedant Rathi and Alex Schneidman and Volker Seeker and Shubho Sengupta and Ishan Sinha and Jimmy Xin and Jujian Zhang},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.29970},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

Minor edits that address two referee reports

R2 v1 2026-07-01T11:46:40.462Z