English

A classification of all 1-Salem graphs

Combinatorics 2012-12-07 v2

Abstract

One way to study certain classes of polynomials is by considering examples that are attached to combinatorial objects. Any graph GG has an associated reciprocal polynomial RGR_G, and with two particular classes of reciprocal polynomials in mind one can ask the questions: (a) when is RGR_G a product of cyclotomic polynomials (giving the cyclotomic graphs)? (b) when does RGR_G have the minimal polynomial of a Salem number as its only non-cyclotomic factor (the non-trival Salem graphs)? Cyclotomic graphs were classified by Smith in 1970. Salem graphs are `spectrally close' to being cyclotomic, in that nearly all their eigenvalues are in the critical interval [-2,2]. On the other hand Salem graphs do not need to be `combinatorially close' to being cyclotomic: the largest cyclotomic induced subgraph might be comparatively tiny. We define an mm-Salem graph to be a connected Salem graph GG for which mm is minimal such that there exists an induced cyclotomic subgraph of GG that has mm fewer vertices than GG. The 1-Salem subgraphs are both spectrally close and combinatorially close to being cyclotomic. Moreover, every Salem graph contains a 1-Salem graph as an induced subgraph, so these 1-Salem graphs provide some necessary substructure of all Salem graphs. The main result of this paper is a complete combinatorial description of all 1-Salem graphs: there are 26 infinite families and 383 sporadic examples.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1109.6275,
  title  = {A classification of all 1-Salem graphs},
  author = {Lee Gumbrell and James McKee},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1109.6275},
  year   = {2012}
}

Comments

14 pages, 8 figures, 2 tables

R2 v1 2026-06-21T19:11:58.428Z