Related papers: The Teichm\"uller group is good

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s)

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to an error in the proof of Theorem 3.8.

This paper has being withdrawn by the authors due to an error in the conclusion.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author; see the much expanded, improved, and generalized version at arXiv:0811.2073.

This article was withdrawn by the arXiv.org administrators since it plagiarizes math.AT/0401211.

This paper has been removed by the author due to a misstatement in Theorem 1 and a gap in its proof. A corrected and largely extended successor (a joint work with Thomas Bauer and Tomasz Szemberg) can be found under math.AG/0312211,

This article is withdrawn because of a mistake in the main result of the paper.

This paper has been withdrawn Abstract: This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to the publication.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error in the derivation.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author since the proof of Lemma 8 is not correct.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an error.

This paper is withdrawn because the results in the paper are included in a paper to be published in Mathematical and Computer Modelling.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, due a crucial error in the proof of the main theorem.

The paper is being withdrawn. A new submission will follow.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due a few mistakes in the paper.

This paper has been withdrawn. The results are now part of math.GR/9804072.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error in the proof of Lemma 2.2.