Related papers: The Teichm\"uller group is good

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a gap in the proof of Lemma 3.4

This paper has been withdrawn due to an error, and no further revisions will be made.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author; see the much expanded, improved, and generalized version at arXiv:0811.2080.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors. Because of a misunderstanding, the paper was submitted prematurely to the arXiv. A replacement will follow.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author(s), due a crucial sign error in Thm. 11.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial sign error in equation 1

This paper has been withdrawn to address an omission. It will be resubmitted in the near future.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author because overcame by arXiv:0910.4694

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, due to the discovery of paper 0201028 which predates it and contains most of it's results.

The paper was removed.

The paper has been withdrawn

This paper has been withdrawn due a crucial mistake due to a crucial mistake in the proof of Lemma 2.3.

This paper has been withdrawn because the content has been substantially improved in a later paper, arXiv:0806.1165.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, because a better treatment is given in the author's Phd. thesis (Sections 3.4.6 and 4.4), now available on the arxiv.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial mistakes.

This paper is withdrawn because the results in the paper are included in a paper to be published in Mathematical and Computer Modelling.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author.

The paper has been withdrawn by change of content and some errors in the examples.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to the presented idea is wrong.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to a significant error in section 4.3.1.