Related papers: Reply to the Comment 'On large-N expansion'

The previously developed renormalizable perturbative 1/N-expansion in higher dimensional scalar field theories is extended to gauge theories with fermions. It is based on the $1/N_f$-expansion and results in a logarithmically divergent…

We comment on the recent attempt by M. Franz et al [1] to further justify their earlier calculation of the gauge-invariant electron propagator in the context of the QED_3 theory of the pseudogap phase in cuprates [2]. First, we use the…

We establish some asymptotic expansions for infinite weighted convolutions of distributions having light subexponential tails. Examples are presented, some showing that in order to obtain an expansion with two significant terms, one needs…

We regret to point out several inaccurate and misleading statements that Benedetto {\em et al.} make in their Reply to our Comment on their paper titled ``Language Trees and Zipping''.

In this note, it is shown that the results claimed in the paper [1]---as well as the examples presented there---are, unfortunately, incorrect.

In this reply, we hope to bring clarifications about the reservations expressed by Floyd in his comments, give further explanations about the choice of the approach and show that our fundamental result can be reproduced by other ways. We…

A shortcoming in the authors' interpretation of this beautiful new experiment is pointed out and briefly discussed.

We reply to L.P. Grishchuk's comment (gr-qc/9801011) on our paper ``The Influence of Cosmological Transitions on the Evolution of Density Perturbations'' (Phys. Rev. D 57, 3302, 1998). We show that his points of criticism are not correct.

Flaw in the treatment of different spin components

This work describes an error in the uncertainty assessment of uncertainties of the Total-Reflection X-ray Fluorescence technique Ref [1]. A confusion, between the precision and accuracy of a measurement produced an incomplete evaluation of…

Rijal, et al. in their recent publication [Phys. Rev. Lett {\bf 122}, 182701 (2019), arXiv:1808.07893], on "Measurement of d + $^7$Be Cross Sections for Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN)", misrepresent their result, they misrepresent previous…

Dr. Brizard's comment on my work is based on a conceived procedure that does not come from my work. The defense of his claim that the modification of the so-called standard Lie's transform theory is unnecessary is also unsupported. This…

We correct erroneous conclusions from Ref.[1] regarding the values of various critical exponents, calculated to the two-loop order, and argue that $\epsilon$-expansion near two spatial dimension, with $\epsilon=d-2$ may not be reliable to…

Here I provide additional experimental information and criticise the analysis, modelling, interpretation and claims presented in the recent paper [Nature Communications 11, 4942 (2020)]. I argue that the authors have no clear experimental…

Two objections have been raised to the arguments presented in O. Cohen, Phys. Rev. A 60, 80 (1999). It is pointed out that neither objection has anything whatsoever to do with the main subject matter of that paper, and shown that both…

We provide an analytical proof of the entropic uncertainty relations presented by de Vicente and Sanchez-Ruiz in [Phys. Rev. A 77, 042110 (2008)] and also show that the replacement of Eq. (27) by Eq. (29) in that reference introduces…

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error in the formulation.

We show that most of the applications of SU_q(2) fermions to statistical mechanics and quantum field theory, previously discussed in literature, are based on a wrong statement about the connection between deformed and undeformed fermion…

This Reply to preceding Comment of arXiv:1909.09867 shows why the statements in the Comment are misleading. We point out that our physical picture and theirs are fundamentally different, therefore the claim of using their correlation to…

We refute a recent claim in the literature of a "new" quantum deformation of GL(2).