Related papers: Reply to Comment on "Mass and K-Lambda Coupling of…
Reply to the Comment by S.V. Kravchenko, A.A. Shashkin, and V.T. Dolgopolov [cond-mat/0106056]
We respond to comments in arXiv:2502.15817v2 about our article, arXiv:2412.12282. We stand by our conclusions and defend them against the criticisms.
This reply addresses concerns expressed in a comment (arXiv:2508.16689v1) on arXiv:submit/6841332 [physics.gen-ph] 29 Sep 2025 the paper given in the title (arXiv:2501.02022v2), hereafter referred to as the paper.
In this paper I have presented Comment on Anandan's paper (J. Anandan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1354 (2000)) [hep-th/9910018].
We remark on the validity of the concerns raised in the comment(cond-mat/0304626) by Fal'ko, Lerner, Tsyplyatyev, and Aleiner..
The $N^*(1535)S_{11}$ coupling strength to the $K^+\Lambda$ channel, $g_{N^*(1535)\Lambda K^+}$, is extracted from the latest and largest $K^+\Lambda$ photoproduction database by using an isobar model. It is found that the coupling is…
Comment on "Backflow in relativistic wave equations" by I. Bialynicki-Birula, Z. Bialynicka-Birula, and S. Augustynowicz [Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, volume 55, page 255702 (2022)].
We reply to the comment arXiv:quant-ph/0702060 on our letter arXiv:quant-ph/0603120 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 100402 (2006)]
This note contains my response to the comment written by J. Franklin on my paper ``Covariant formulation of electrodynamics in isotropic media''.
This is a Reply on the proceeding comment on our paper titled "Classical Simulations Including Electron Correlations for Sequential Double Ionization".
After the rejection of their comment [arXiv:cond-mat/0609399v1] to our Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 97}, 100601 (2006), the Authors informed us that an extended version of their comment is going to be published in a different journal under the…
I reply to a Comment by Q. Wang and W.G. Unruh regarding my paper "Hiding the Cosmological Constant" [Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 131302].
We reply the comment made by Caracciolo et al. (cond. mat./0305213) to our work "Dynamic behavior of anisotropic non-equilibrium driving lattice gases", cond-mat/021041.
In a recent comment [1], Masud Mansuripur presented some concerns with theoretical and experimental interpretations of She's paper [2], and concluded that She's conclusion is incorrect. We agree that, some of the She's work required further…
Comment on ``Lancaster Probabilities and Gibbs Sampling'' [arXiv:0808.3852]
The conclusions presented in this Letter arXiv:cond-mat/0412591 rely on not converged calculations and should be considered with caution.
We respond to the recent comment [arXiv:1105.1593] on our Letter [G. G. Plunk and T. Tatsuno, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 165003 (2011)]. The comment claims that our argument for spectral transfer direction is incomplete. The comment gives an…
A reply to the comment by S. Friedemann et al. [arXiv:1207.0536] on our article [Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 137002 (2011), arXiv:1012.0303].
A comment on ``Comment on ``Standard Model Mass Spectrum and Interactions In The Holomorphic Unified Field Theory""
We reply to the "Comment on 'The Lifshitz-Matsubara sum formula for the Casimir pressure between magnetic metallic mirrors'" [arXiv:1604.06432]. We believe the comment misrepresents our papers, and fails to provide a plausible resolution to…