Related papers: Reply to Comment on "Stripes and the t-J Model"

Reply to the comment of E.M. Chudnovsky and D.A. Garanin on Europhys. Lett. 46, 692 (1999).

A reply to the comment by S. Friedemann et al. [arXiv:1207.0536] on our article [Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 137002 (2011), arXiv:1012.0303].

We introduce a new model and mechanism of high temperature pairing in stripes. We propose a way to unambiguously test it by numerical simulations. For example, the implementation of our mechanism in a 6-leg t-J ladder model has the effect…

Reply to the comment, cond-mat/0209398 by by N.W. Watkins, S.C. Chapman, and G. Rowlands

Reply to the Comment by S.V. Kravchenko, A.A. Shashkin, and V.T. Dolgopolov [cond-mat/0106056]

In arXiv:1108.5413v1, Lee and Lee use several comparisons to argue that the physics of the three-band model found (Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 036401 (2011)) can be explained in the one-band model's framework (Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 057001 (2003)).…

Reply to the Comment [arXiv:1609.04476] on a recent work in PRL [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 036601 (2016), arXiv:1511.02994v2].

It is shown that the recent criticism of Brevik et al. (hep-th/0004041) is in error.

Stamp and Tupitsyn (ST) have recently posted a Comment (P.C.E. Stamp and I.S. Tupitsyn, arXiv:cond-mat/0211413) on a Letter of ours (J.J. Alonso and J.F. Fernandez, Phys. Rev. Lett. v87, 097205 (2001)). They claim that, in our Letter,…

We comment on Z. D. Zhang's Response [arXiv:0812.2330] to our recent Comment [arXiv:0811.3876] addressing the conjectured solution of the three-dimensional Ising model reported in [arXiv:0705.1045].

This is a reply to the comment by M. Kastner and M. Promberger [cond-mat/0011516] on the paper published in J. Stat. Phys. 99, 691 (2000) and also in cond-mat/0002176. We show that all their criticisms do not apply.

Here we give our reply to the comment by Sibirtsev et al on our paper ``Mass and K-Lambda Coupling of the N*(1535)".

We compare the results of our two papers with the results of the paper Aratyn H., Gomes J.F., Zimerman A.H., Higher order Painlev\'e equations and their symmetries via reductions of a class of integrable models, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., V.…

We respond to Comment on our recent letter (Phys.Rev.Lett.99:092501,2007) by Dean et al (arXiv:0709.0449).

This is the reply to the comment by I. S. Burmistrov, P. D. Kurilovich, and V. D. Kurilovich [arXiv:1903.047241] on our paper "Noise in the helical edge channel anisotropically coupled to a local spin" [JETP Lett. 108, 664 (2018),…

This comment is to show that our simulation data, based on our theory and method in Ref. [J. Phys. B 41, 055401 (2008)], are also in agreement with the experimental data presented for $D_{p}-D_{s}$ in Ref. [Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{109},…

The models in the two papers hep-ph/0608068 and hep-ph/0701254 by Chang et al. with the so-called shadow gauge and scalar fields are nothing but convenient tailored versions of our model in hep-th/0403039. The same remarks applies to the…

Reply to the comment by D.N. Aristov and A.G. Yashenkin (cond-mat/9612245) on PRL by Balatsky and Salkola (Phys. Rev. Lett., V76, 2386, (1996), cond-mat/9602034).

We comment on the recent paper "Large-Scale Monte Carlo Study of a Realistic Lattice Model for Ga_(1-x)Mn_xAs" by Y. Yildirim, G. Alvarez, A. Moreo and E. Dagotto", Phys Rev. Lett.{\bf 99}, 057207 (2007); cond-mat/0612002

This article is a reply to the Comment by D. Spemann et al (arXiv:1204.2992) in response to our paper 'Revealing common artifacts due to ferromagnetic inclusions in highly oriented pyrolytic graphite' (EPL, 97 (2012) 47001).