Related papers: Reply to the Comment on "Bound States in the One-d…
A recent paper by Bluemer et al. [cond-mat/0609758] again criticizes earlier QMC/DMFT results by Liebsch [Phys. Rev. B {\bf 70}, 165103 (2004)]. This criticism is shown to be unfounded.
This is a reply to the comment by M. Kastner and M. Promberger [cond-mat/0011516] on the paper published in J. Stat. Phys. 99, 691 (2000) and also in cond-mat/0002176. We show that all their criticisms do not apply.
In a recent preprint by Kiefer-Emmanouilidis, Unanyan, Fleischhauer and Sirker [arxiv:2203.06689] the authors comment on our work which studied the number entropy in strongly disordered systems. The data presented in the comment does not…
In a Comment [cond-mat/0506138] on our recent e-print [cond-mat/0505106] Liebsch claimed "excellent correspondence" between our high-precision quantum Monte-Carlo (QMC) data for the anisotropic two-band Hubbard model with Ising type…
Eisenstein and Bunn have widely circulated a Comment (astro-ph/9704247) suggesting a non-standard null hypothesis in a test for cosmological birefringence. The Comment misrepresents the procedure used by Nodland and Ralston (B. Nodland and…
This reply tries to rectify some misunderstandings that are in our opinion contained in the Comment by Campostrini and Rossi, <hep-lat 99407008> on our paper <hep-lat 9407003>.
We reply to a recent comment by Bhattacharya et. al. (cond-mat/9812290) on our previous Letter (PRL 81, 5640 (1998)).
It is shown that the recent criticism of Brevik et al. (hep-th/0004041) is in error.
We argue that the statistical features of generalized coherent states for power-law potentials based on Heisenberg algebra, presented in a recent paper by Berrada et al (Phys. Lett. A, 375, 298 (2011)) are incorrect.
A detailed comparison of QMC/DMFT results for the non-isotropic two-band Hubbard model by Liebsch [Phys. Rev. B 70, 165103 (2004)] and C. Knecht, N. Bluemer, and P. G. J. van Dongen [cond-mat/0505106 (submitted to Phys. Rev. Lett.)] is…
We comment on the Reply of G. Su and M. Suzuki [cond-mat/9808011] to our Comment [cond-mat/9807402] about the papers of G. Su [Phys. Rev. B 54, 8291 (1996)] and G. Su and M. Suzuki [Phys. Rev. B 57, 13367 (1998)]. The algebraic mistake…
It is shown that the title Comment by W. Szczepanik, M. Dulak, and T. A. Wesolowski [Int. J. Quantum Chem. 106 (2006)] is unsatisfactory.
We respond to invalid criticism in the recent Comment by Schneider et al. [arXiv:1407.4127v1]
We show that the argument in Phys Rev Lett 70 (1993) 1360 is correct and consistent, and that Hagen & Sudarshan's solution has inconsistency leading to non-vanishing commutators of $[P^1, P^2]$ and $[P^j, H]$ even in physical states. This…
In this reply, I point out that the comment by Jacques H.H. Perk on my paper "Exact Solution for Three-Dimensional Ising Model" [Symmetry 2021, 13, 1837] is wrong because the author seems not to understand the Onsager operators along both…
A reply to the above mentioned commentary by M.M. Block and F. Halzen on our quoted work is presented. We answer to each point raised by these authors and argument that our data reductions, strategies and methodology are adequate to the…
Dass, Qureshi, and Sheel conjecture that the lower bound in the Heisenberg-Robertson uncertainty relation cannot be reached in mixed states. The conjecture is wrong.
In a comment cond-mat/9811080 to our paper (PRL, vol 81, 1698 (1998)) H. Bokil, A. Bray, B. Drossel and M. Moore claimed that we have reached wrong conclusions. We show here why their claims are not correct, especially when compared to the…
Response to Comment by A. Bussmann-Holder (arXiv:0909.3603)
This article is a thorough critique to the Weniger's comments made to our papers published in prestigious journals in the recent years. A detailed and critical examination of the arguments that led to the suggested comment by Weniger…