Related papers: Comment on "Like-Charge Attraction and Hydrodynami…

Comment on B.A. Bernevig, D. Giuliano, and R.B. Laughlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3392 (2001).

We demonstrate that the attractive interaction measured between like-charged colloidal spheres near a wall can be accounted for by a nonequilibrium hydrodynamic effect. We present both analytical results and Brownian dynamics simulations…

We make remarks on Ristroph and Zhang's [{\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} 101, 194502 (2008)] paper.

A Comment on the Letter by D. Hemanth Kumar et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 144301 (2004)

Comment on the paper of Ha and Liu (Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 79}, 1289 (1997)) regarding the nature of attraction between like charged rods. We demostrate that their results do not produce the correct low temperature limit.

In this paper I have presented Comment on Anandan's paper (J. Anandan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1354 (2000)) [hep-th/9910018].

Comment on paper by Blanchette and Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 144501 (2009).

This is a comment on [G. Knight and R. Klages, Phys. Rev. E 84, 041135 (2011); also available at arXiv:1107.5293v2 [math-ph]].

The bare Coulomb interaction between two like-charges is repulsive. When these charges are immersed in an electrolyte, the thermal fluctuations of the ions turn the bare Coulomb interaction into an effective interaction between the two…

Comment on the Letter by M. Franz and Z. Tesanovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. v.87, p.257003 (2001).

This is a comment on J. Schmittbuhl, A. Hansen, and G. G. Batrouni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 045505 (2003). They offer a reply, in turn.

This paper is Comment on the paper: S.A.R. Horsley and M. Babiker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 010405 (2005).

A Comment on the Letter by C. R. Galley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 174301 (2013).

A Comment on the Letter by S. Zelakiewicz et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1942 (2000).

Comment on Proximity breakdown of hydrides in superconducting niobium cavities [arXiv:1212.3384].

This is a comment on "How to Observe Coherent Electron Dynamics Directly" [H. J. Suominen and A. Kirrander, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 043002 (2014)].

A comment on the letter by M. Machida and T. Koyama, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 94}, 140401 (2005) and also on the preprint by Y. Kawaguchi and T. Ohmi, cond-mat/0411018.

A comment on the recent paper of R Manica, J N Connor, L Y Clasohm, S L Carnie, R G Horn, D Y C Chan, Transient response of a wetting film to mechanical and electrical perturbations, Langmuir 2008, 24, 1381.

A Comment on the Letter by B. Kraus {\it Phys. Rev. Lett.}{\bf 104}, 020504 (2010).

A Comment on the Letter by C. F. Qiao and L. Tang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 221601 (2014) [arXiv:1408.3995]