Related papers: Comment on "Like-Charge Attraction and Hydrodynami…

Invited expert opinion on the article S. Kremer and R. Fresard, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 524, 21 (2012).

A review of the recent progress of relativistic hydrodynamic attractors is presented, with a focus on applications in heavy ion collisions and the quark gluon plasma. Pedagogical introductions to the effective descriptions relevant for…

A comment on the paper by Lopez et al. [A. Lopez, Z. Z. Sun, and J. Schliemann, Phys. Rev. B 85, 205428 (2012)].

We provide our reply to the comment by Greiter and Schuricht (cond-mat/0511607).

Long-ranged attractions across water between two surfaces that are randomly covered with (mobile) positive and negative charge domains have been attributed to induced correlation of the charges (positive lining up with negative) as the…

Comment on "Liquids on Topologically Nanopatterned Surfaces" by O. Gang et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 217801 (2005). See also an erratum published by O. Gang et al (Phys Rev Lett, to appear)

Three comments on a recent paper entitled ``Macroscopic surface charges from microscopic simulations'' [J. Chem. Phys. 153, 164709 (2020)]

We comment on recent e-print by L. Mardoyan et al. [cond-mat/0609768]

We make some comments about the results we obtained in Phys. Rev. Lett. 86,3392(2001), and in Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 177206 (2001), and show that the conclusion of a recent paper [cond-mat/0409495] leveling some criticism on our results is, in…

We reply to the comments on our paper "Quantum Confinement in Hydrogen Bond" (Int. J. Quantum Chem. 115 (2015) 765 DOI: 10.1002/qua.24894) made by Matthias Heger and Martin A. Suhm.

We show that claims, presented in Phys. Rev. B {\bf 65}, 125109 (2002) concerning the threshold behavior of dynamical correlations of a Coulomb Luttinger liquid, are based on an inconsistent mathematical analysis. Physical arguments are…

A Comment on the Letter by M. Rupp et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 058301 (2012).

Comment on paper by A. Zvyagin, Phys. Rev. B 64, R060405 (2001).

Comment on the paper "Novel Convective Instabilities in a Magnetic Fluid" by W. Luo, T. Du, and J. Huang, Phys. Rev. Lett., v.82, p.4134 (1999).

Letter/comment on M. Rini, Physics $\textbf{13}$, s94 (July 27, 2020) and A. Sanna et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. $\textbf{125}$, 057001 (2020).

Comment on the paper Schiavoni et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 094101 (2003).

This is a comment on "Universal Fluctuations in Correlated Systems", by Bramwell et al, Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 3744 (2000.

In the recent work [1], authors discussed the relationship between the two of Euler angles assuming that it can be used to describe some effects in the theory of a rigid body. I show that this assumption is not properly justified.

This is a reply to a Comment on 'A test-tube model for rainfall', {\it Europhys. Lett.}, {\bf 106}, 40001, (2014).

Here we give further evidences to support our scaling relation described in our previous paper [cond-mat/0006459, Phys. Rev. Lett. Vol.85, pp.1238 (2000)].