Related papers: Comment on ``A Comparison Between Broad Histogram …
This combines a reply to the Comment [hep-th/0203067 v1] by A. N. Vaidya and R. de L. Rodrigues with an erratum to our Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 210405 (2001)]
In a comment cond-mat/9811080 to our paper (PRL, vol 81, 1698 (1998)) H. Bokil, A. Bray, B. Drossel and M. Moore claimed that we have reached wrong conclusions. We show here why their claims are not correct, especially when compared to the…
This Commentary on the paper "Total Hadronic Cross Section Data and the Froissart-Martin Bound", by Fagundes, Menon and Silva, to be published in Braz. J. of Phys., Vol. 42 (2012) (arXiv 1112.4704), was invited by the Editors of the…
A recently proposed method (O. Miramontes, P. Rohani, Physica D 166 (2002) 147) for estimating the scaling exponent in very short time series may give wrong results, especially in case of undersampled data.
Parvan [arXiv:0911.0383v1] [1] has recently presented some calculations in order to demonstrate the incorrectness of the results obtained from the generalized multinomial coefficients (GMC) presented in Ref. [2]. According to Parvan, the…
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to text overlap with arXiv:1102.5004, as well as omission of proper citations to arXiv:1110.4655 and arXiv:1111.0313
Comment an the recent Letter [Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2050 (2001)] by F.Wang and D. P. Landau.
An error in the paper [J. Math. Phys. 43, 6343 (2002); math-ph/0207009] is corrected. Further explanation is given.
Comment on "New Mean-Field Theory of the tt't"J Model Applied to the High-Tc Superconductors" by T. C. Ribeiro and X.-G. Wen [cond-mat/0410750; Physical Review Letters 95, 057001 (2005)].
This article corrects two mistakes in the article "Coarse homology theories" [math.AT/0106183].
The critique against using Boltzmann's microcanonical entropy, an "ensemble measure", as foundation of statistics is rebuffed. The confusion of the microcanonical distribution with the exponential Boltzmann-Gibbs (``BG'') distribution is…
Two contributions to the discussion of Fearnhead P. and D. Prangle (2012). Constructing summary statistics for approximate Bayesian computation: Semi-automatic approx- imate Bayesian computation, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B, 74 (3).
We undertake a critical evaluation of recent observational information on $\Omega_m$ and $\Omega_\Lambda$ in order to identify possible sources of systematic errors and effects of simplified statistical analyses. We combine observations for…
We show that the principal results of the article "The metric dimension of graph with pendant edges" [Journal of Combinatorial Mathematics and Combinatorial Computing, 65 (2008) 139--145] do not hold. In this paper we correct the results…
Some of my previous publications were incomplete in the sense that non trivial zeros belonging to a particular type of fundamental domain have been inadvertently ignored. Due to this fact, I was brought to believe that computations done by…
We examine a series of articles on honeybee odometry and navigation published between 1996 and 2010, and find inconsistencies in results, duplicated figures, indications of data manipulation, and incorrect calculations. This suggests that…
We start from recently published numerical data by Hatano and Gubernatis cond-mat/0008115 to discuss properties of convergence to equilibrium of optimized Monte Carlo methods (bivariate multi canonical and parallel tempering). We show that…
Fernandez Comment [1] on our pseudo-perturbative shifted-l expansion technique [2,3] is either unfounded or ambiguous.
In the Comment we scrutinized the quartet basis for the Delta resonances, and the high-momentum truncation scheme, suggested by Bicudo et al. Not all the results and claims has been properly justified by the authors.
The paper of Unal [J. Math. Phys. 59, 062104 (2018)], though worthy of attention, contains a conclusion that is in error and may mislead the efforts to extend his results. The aim of the present note is twofold: we provide a correction to…