Related papers: Comments on "Recent Developments in Plasmon-Assist…
When analyzing the content of Physics Letter B (PLB) web pages, one goal was to separate articles from particle physics(HEP) and nuclear physics(NP). PLB contains information about the subject area of an article: Astrophysics and Cosmology,…
We respond to Comment on our recent letter (Phys.Rev.Lett.99:092501,2007) by Dean et al (arXiv:0709.0449).
Important omissions in arXiv:2211.02241v3, "Spin and spin current -- From fundamentals to recent progress", by Sadamichi Maekawa et al, are indicated.
No abstract available, since this is a Comment on a published article (cf. title)
We reply to David's comment (hep-lat/9504017) on our paper Phys.Rev.Lett. 74(1995)1920.
In this manuscript we reply to the criticisms of our paper [Eur. Phys. J. A 24, 437 (2005)] raised in a recent preprint by Achasov and Kiselev [hep-ph/0606268] and demonstrate that all their criticisms are completely irrelevant and…
This results in this paper have been merged with the result in arXiv:1002.3763v1 The authors would like to withdraw this version. Please see arXiv:1008.5356v1 for the merged version.
After carefully studying the comment by Wang et al. (arXiv:1408.6420), we found it includes several mistakes and unjustified statements and Wang et al. lack very basic knowledge of dislocations. Moreover, there is clear evidence indicating…
I point out the incorrect statement of the recent manuscript by K.Penc and B.S.Shastry.
Misunderstandings have occurred regarding the conclusions of the paper by S. Arndt, W. Dappen and A. Nayfonov 1998, ApJ 498, 349. At occasions, its results were interpreted as if it had shown basic flaws in the general theory of dynamical…
I give a brief overview of arXiv history, and describe the current state of arXiv practice, both technical and sociological. This commentary originally appeared in the EMBO Journal, 19 Oct 2016. It was intended as an update on comments from…
Amato et al.[arXiv:1205.6418] maintain that certain data published in Carpinteri et al.[2] are not the result of independent measurements, and are in any case affected by uncertainties such that our conclusions are not valid. We will…
We respond below to the comment of E. I. Lashin [ arXiv:1505.03070 ] on our work Phys. Lett. {\bf B741} (2015) 276-279 [ arXiv:1404.3093 ], and point out the errors in that comment.
In our comment we show that some of the very difficult problems have been successfully solved. We have to focus on the resolved problems, since the authors claims: Our hope, however, is that the topics we have presented will provide…
We comment on the latest paper [K.-H. Ding, Z.-G. Zhu, and J. Berakdar, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 24, 266003 (2012)].
We respond to the criticisms of a recent paper of Buchert et al. [arXiv:1505.07800]
We comment on the purported violation of local realism, by a single photon induced correlations between homodyne detectors, which one can find in: New J. Phys. 10, 113024 (2008), [arXiv:0807.0109]. The claim is erroneous, due to a…
We are pleased to see that Jeckelmann has made many changes to the original version of his comment on our paper as a result of our response. Here is a copy of this powerful response that reveals problems in his previous results. However,…
The Comment criticizes the bifurcation analysis performed in the original paper on a Vlasov equation. This criticism can be traced back to a discrepancy in the definition of the paramagnetic phase. Apart from this discrepancy, there is no…
We refute all claims of the "Comment on "Normalization of quasinormal modes in leaky optical cavities and plasmonic resonators" " by E. A. Muljarov and W. Langbein (arXiv:1602.07278v1). Based entirely on information already contained in our…