English
Related papers

Related papers: Comments on "Recent Developments in Plasmon-Assist…

200 papers

The authors of preprint arXiv:1810.00565 and paper in Light: Science & Applications (2019), Y. Dubi and Y. Sivan, made several wrong and inconsistent comments on several of our papers. In addition, the paper in Faraday Discuss. 214, 215-233…

Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics · Physics 2020-10-15 Alexander O. Govorov , Lucas V. Besteiro

Reply to comment on "Thermal effects -- an alternative mechanism for plasmon-assisted photocatalysis" by P. Jain [Chem. Sci., 2020, 11, DOI: 10.1039/D0SC02914A]

Materials Science · Physics 2020-08-18 Yonatan Dubi , Ieng Wai Un , Yonatan Sivan

Our Comment [Sivan et al., Science 2019] (as well as its longer version [Dubi, Un, & Sivan, ArXiv 2019], and the supporting theoretical studies [Dubi and Sivan, ArXiv 2018]) on recent attempts to distinguish thermal and non-thermal ("hot…

Chemical Physics · Physics 2019-07-11 Yonatan Sivan , Joshua Baraban , Yonatan Dubi

It is shown that criticism of my paper arXiv:0801.0656 Phys. Rev. Lett, vol. 101, 163202 (2008) by the authors of Comment arXiv:0810.3243v1 is wrong and that their main arguments are in contradiction with established concepts of statistical…

Statistical Mechanics · Physics 2008-11-23 L. P. Pitaevskii

I comment on a recent preprint "A Proposal to Measure Photon-Photon Scattering" that appeared recently as arXiv:1106.0465v1 [hep-ph].

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Physics 2011-06-08 Denis Bernard

This Comment points out a number of errors in the recent paper by Zarechnaya, Dubrovinskaia, Dubrovinsky, et al. (Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 185501 (2009)). Results and conclusions presented by Zarechnaya et al. (2009) are either incorrect or…

Materials Science · Physics 2010-12-30 A. R. Oganov , V. L. Solozhenko , O. O. Kurakevych , C. Gatti , Y. Ma , J. Chen , Z. Liu , R. J. Hemley

In this communication we refute a criticism concerning results of our work [3] that was presented in references [1] and [2].

Superconductivity · Physics 2018-10-12 A. F. Volkov , F. S. Bergeret , K. B. Efetov

The reply by Oughstun et al. [J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 28, 468-469 (2011)] to our comment [J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 28, 450-452 (2011)] on their recently published paper [J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27, 1664-1670 (2010)] is shown to make no response to the main…

Optics · Physics 2011-02-24 Bruno Macke , Bernard Ségard

A comment has been recently posted on the arXiv (arXiv:1902.07504) that discuss our recent work on encircling multiple exceptional points in Nat. Commun. 9, 4808 (2018). In that comment, the authors claim that our approach is prone to…

Quantum Physics · Physics 2019-03-19 Q. Zhong , M. Khajavikhan , D. N. Christodoulides , R. El-Ganainy

We reply to the comments on our previous paper Physical Review Letters, Vol. 129, 087001 (2022), raised by Th\'eo S\'epulcre, Serge Florens, and Izak Snyman in arXiv:2210.00742.

Mesoscale and Nanoscale Physics · Physics 2024-06-14 Kanta Masuki , Hiroyuki Sudo , Masaki Oshikawa , Yuto Ashida

We comment on the paper `UCN anomalous losses and the UCN capture cross section on material defects' by A. Serebrov et al., Phys. Lett. A 335 (2005) 327 - 336. Data presented do not originate from these authors alone but were taken in…

Nuclear Experiment · Physics 2015-06-26 M. Daum , P. Geltenbort , R. Henneck , K. Kirch

In this Comment we show that the statements made in PRB85, 014505 (2012) regarding our work (PRL 100, 227007 (2008))) are incorrect because they result from model artifacts. We address the issues neglected in PRB85, 014505 (2012) and…

Superconductivity · Physics 2013-05-30 A. Gurevich , V. M. Vinokur

Below we analyze the `critic' statements made in the Preprint arXiv:1301.1828v1 [nucl-th]. The doubtful scientific argumentation of the authors of the Preprint arXiv:1301.1828v1 [nucl-th] is also discussed.

Nuclear Theory · Physics 2013-11-22 K. A. Bugaev , D. R. Oliinychenko , A. S. Sorin

We briefly remind references and arguments, already discussed in the past, which confute erroneous claims in arXiv:1210.5501.

In the recently posted arXiv:2312.04495v3 [1], its authors used a computer code written by me supplied to them by the authors of Ref. [2], and claimed that the results that they obtained invalidate the results and conclusions presented in…

Superconductivity · Physics 2024-01-18 J. E. Hirsch

This paper replies the comments by J. D. Jackson [Am. J. Phys. 75, 844-845 (2007)] and V. Hnizdo [Am. J. Phys. 75, 845-846 (2007)].

Classical Physics · Physics 2008-12-31 Jose A. Heras

Shukla and Akbari-Moghanjoughi have {\it corrected} their Comment (see their version 1 on `arXiv:1207.7029v1) to EPL on our work [1] after receiving our Response from the Editors of EPL. We have a pleasant duty at hand to present our second…

Plasma Physics · Physics 2015-06-11 J. Vranjes , B. P. Pandey , S. Poedts

After the rejection of their comment [arXiv:cond-mat/0609399v1] to our Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 97}, 100601 (2006), the Authors informed us that an extended version of their comment is going to be published in a different journal under the…

Statistical Mechanics · Physics 2007-05-23 Fulvio Baldovin , Enzo Orlandini

The referred-to paper on antiproton production contains two errors: an error in the value reported for one of the fit parameters and an error in units. I give the errors and the corrected values when possible.

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Physics 2018-07-26 R. H. Bernstein

The commented manuscript was submitted for publication without informing at least four of the other authors, viz. N. Severijns, O. Zimmer, H.-F. Wirth and D. Rich. This violates our rights as collaborators. The analysis presented and the…

Nuclear Experiment · Physics 2008-11-26 N. Severijns , O. Zimmer , H. -F. Wirth , D. Rich
‹ Prev 1 2 3 10 Next ›