Related papers: Comment on "Experimental retrodiction of trajector…
This is a comment on E. D. Greaves et al. paper. We argue that their laboratory experiment cannot be interpreted as measuring the one-way speed of light.
We reply to the criticism raised by Ao in his Comment (cond-mat/9801180). Being unable to properly treat the Hall conductivity in a mixed state of superconductors, Ao is looking for possible mistakes in microscopic and phenomenological…
It is argued that Trauzettel et al. [Phys. Rev. B 75, 035305 (2007)] made some mistakes in their calculations regarding the photon-assisted transport in graphene that lead to uncoupled sidebands and emergence of step-like features in dG/dV…
I comment on a recent preprint "Neutrino Velocity Anomalies: A Resolution without a Revolution" that appeared recently as arXiv:1110.0989 [hep-ph]
An inadequate approximation and its consequences as well as an incorrect statement made in cond-mat/0102150v2 are pointed out.
Here, we reply to the comment by Y. Kurihara. We show that the argument by the author is on an improper basis and thus disagree with his opinion.
Comment on "High Resolution Polar Effect Measurements of Sr2RuO4: Evidence for Broken Time-Reversal Symmetry in the Superconducting State" by J. Xia et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 167002 (2006).
Rejoinder: Classifier Technology and the Illusion of Progress [math.ST/0606441]
We demonstrate that criticisms concerning our work nucl-th/9704043, made in the recent preprint hep-ph/9903352, are unfounded. The improvements over our results claimed in hep-ph/9903352 are in fact spurious, being based mainly on…
Withdrawn by author. This paper was mistakenly submitted twice (See nucl-th/0604008)
Fernandez Comment [1] on our pseudo-perturbative shifted-l expansion technique [2,3] is either unfounded or ambiguous.
We derive the weak value deflection given in a paper by Dixon et al. (Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 173601 (2009)) both quantum mechanically and classically. This paper is meant to cover some of the mathematical details omitted in that paper owing…
There is an error in the proof (but not the truth) of Theorem 3.2 in the author's 1985 paper "The Double-Wedge Algebra for Quantum Fields on Schwarzschild and Minkowski Spacetimes" in "Communications in Mathematical Physics". The author…
We reply to the comments on our previous paper Physical Review Letters, Vol. 129, 087001 (2022), raised by Th\'eo S\'epulcre, Serge Florens, and Izak Snyman in arXiv:2210.00742.
In [Ritika Garg et al., Phys. Rev. C 100, 069901(E) (2019)] the experimental results on the polarization asysmetry were revised due to a claimed change of the geometry asymmetry. However, the revised results can not be reproduced as claimed…
The Comment by Duval et al. [PRL 96, 099701 (2006)] addresses an important, but not the main, result of our Letter [PRL 95, 137204 (2005)]. It does not contradict our results in substance, and the only objection is really on the style of…
There are some inaccuracies and errors in my article "Dual and almost-dual homogeneous spaces". Here I will describe in detail how to correct incorrect statements from this article and which statements there will have to be reformulated in…
The authors of preprint arXiv:2009.00286 and paper Appl. Phys. Lett. 117, 130501 (2020), Y. Sivan and Y. Dubi, made several wrong and inconsistent comments on our papers [J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 16616-16631 (2013), ACS Photonics 4 (11),…
A Comment on the Letter by S. Zelakiewicz et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1942 (2000).
This submission is a comment on an article that had previously appeared in Phys. Rev. Lett.