Related papers: Comment on "Experimental retrodiction of trajector…
The comment by Lundeen et al. contains two criticisms of our proposal. While we agree that the state-preparation procedure could be replaced by a simpler setup as proposed by the authors of the comment, we do not agree with the authors on…
Yuan and Feng [Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138:70, 2023] recently proposed a modification of the nested Mach-Zehnder interferometer experiment performed by Danan et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 111:240402, 2013] and argued that photons give "contradictory"…
This is a comment on Phys. Rev. A 67, 022104(2003).
We show that the "defective" terms in the expression that Dondera [Phys. Rev. D 98, 096008 (2018)] obtained for the momentum of the retarded field of an accelerating point charge are mathematically well justified. The repair should not be…
This is an erratum to the paper published in Nucl. Phys. B198(1982)508.
We respond to invalid criticism in the recent Comment by Schneider et al. [arXiv:1407.4127v1]
Paper withdrawn due to errors. Revised version may or may not appear in the future.
We make remarks on Fern\'{a}ndez Guasti's paper [{\it J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.} 39 (2006) 11825-11832] by pointing out some mistakes Fern\'{a}ndez Guasti derived therein.
Results have been moved to a published article, see arXiv:0812.2669v4[math.PR]
We respond to `Comments on the U(2) ADHM two-instanton' [Y. Tian, Phys. Lett. B 566 (2003) 183].
We discuss the claims of the comment at arXiv.org:physics/0609234. We show that A.V. Kildishev et al. misread our method of extracting of optical constants of nanostructured films. The theoretical calculations performed in the comment…
It is shown that the results of ref [1] are consistent.
We experimentally investigate the suitability of a multi-path waveguide interferometer with mechanical shutters for performing a test for hypercomplex quantum mechanics. Probing the interferometer with coherent light we systematically…
Correction to The Annals of Probability 21 (1993) 554--580 [http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aop/1176989415]
We review the results of our previous publication [Phys. Rev. D63, 116001 (2001); hep-ph/0012226] in the light of recent calculations and comments.
A recent comment highlights a discussion at the PATRAS Workshop on Axions, WIMPs and WISPs relating to a recent publication. We respond to this comment, and detail a calculation error in the original letter.
In this brief report we pointed at mistake in paper A. Zholents, Damping Force in the Transit-Time Method of Optical Stochastic Cooling, PRLST. Mar 1, 2012. 2 pp. Published in Phys.Rev.ST Accel. Beams 15 (2012) 032801.
Comment withdrawn. To be superseded by a subseqent paper.
A significant mathematical error is identified and corrected in a recent highly-cited paper on oscillatory flows of second-grade fluids [Fetecau & Fetecau (2005). Int. J. Eng. Sci., 43, 781--789]. The corrected solutions are shown to agree…
This work describes an error in the uncertainty assessment of uncertainties of the Total-Reflection X-ray Fluorescence technique Ref [1]. A confusion, between the precision and accuracy of a measurement produced an incomplete evaluation of…