Related papers: Reply to "Comment on `Quantum Raychaudhuri Equatio…

In this communication we refute a criticism concerning results of our work [3] that was presented in references [1] and [2].

In response to the comment by Zhu and Berakdar (arXiv:1207.3457) that the physical system considered by them in their previous work [Ding et al., PRB 84, 115433 (2011)] is conceptually different from ours in the appendix of our latest paper…

We show that, contrarily to the claims in [K. Bradler, (2011), arXiv:1108.5553] (and arXiv:1201.1045), the reference [Phys. Rev. A 83, 062323 (2011)] is devoid of flaws or mistakes. We show that the criticism comes from a misunderstanding…

We show that a recent letter claiming to present exact cosmological solutions in Brans-Dicke theory actually uses a flawed set of equations as the starting point for their analysis. The results presented in the letter are therefore not…

With regard to the recently published article, ``Y.-Q. Wang, et al., Physical mechanism of equiprobable exclusion network with heterogeneous interactions in phase transitions: Analytical analyses of steady state evolving from initial state,…

We make some comments about the results we obtained in Phys. Rev. Lett. 86,3392(2001), and in Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 177206 (2001), and show that the conclusion of a recent paper [cond-mat/0409495] leveling some criticism on our results is, in…

This note rebuts an old, but recurring claim by Antoniou, Davis and Diakonos [1] that the critical point and associated critical exponents reported in Ref. [2], is based on an erroneous treatment of scaling relations near the critical…

The present paper is written in response to the critical comments of M.R. Hadizadeh on our original paper Tetraquarks as diquark-antidiquark bound systems [Phys. Lett. B 741, 124 (2015), arXiv:1505.07510]. We present our clarifications on…

We welcome Allagui et al.'s discussions about our recent paper that has proposed revisions to the existing theory of capacitors. It gives us an opportunity to emphasize on the physical underpinnings of the mathematical expressions that are…

This paper has been withdrawn as it has been superseded by 0808.2697

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial error in eq.59. I apologize for the inconveniences.

Gates et al (astro-ph/9606132) have raised several issues in their Comment on our Letter (Phys. Rev. Lett. Vol. 76, p.3886 (1996); astro-ph/9605001). We clarify these issues and show that our results are robust, and there is no…

This is a 1-page comment on a wrong paper that recently appeared in PRL (Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (23), 5393 (2001), also quant-ph/0101004). The authors claim to have shown that using a quantum computer gives an "exponential advantage" for…

It is shown that the results of ref [1] are consistent.

We argue that the claim given in quant-ph/9801014 is untenable. The fallacy in the proof is a misinterpretation of the no-cloning theorem, which does not allow quantum jumps, specifically measurements.

It is shown that the arguments in the reply of Z.-D. Zhang (arXiv:0812.0194) to the comment arXiv:0811.1802 defending his conjectures in arXiv:0705.1045 are invalid. His conjectures have been thoroughly disproved.

We discuss the claims of the comment at arXiv.org:physics/0609234. We show that A.V. Kildishev et al. misread our method of extracting of optical constants of nanostructured films. The theoretical calculations performed in the comment…

I reply to a Comment by Q. Wang and W.G. Unruh regarding my paper "Hiding the Cosmological Constant" [Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 131302].

We respond to the recent comment [arXiv:1105.1593] on our Letter [G. G. Plunk and T. Tatsuno, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 165003 (2011)]. The comment claims that our argument for spectral transfer direction is incomplete. The comment gives an…

Some mathematical errors of the paper commented upon [W.-M. Suen, Phys. Rev. D 40, (1989) 315] are corrected.