Comment on "On two misconceptions in current relativistic quantum information"
Abstract
We show that, contrarily to the claims in [K. Bradler, (2011), arXiv:1108.5553] (and arXiv:1201.1045), the reference [Phys. Rev. A 83, 062323 (2011)] is devoid of flaws or mistakes. We show that the criticism comes from a misunderstanding of part of our work. We also discuss the claims made in arXiv:1108.5553 about entanglement measures as a valid tool in relativistic quantum information.
Cite
@article{arxiv.1108.6074,
title = {Comment on "On two misconceptions in current relativistic quantum information"},
author = {M. Montero and E. Martin-Martinez},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1108.6074},
year = {2012}
}
Comments
5 pages, added Journal reference (PRA reply to Phys. Rev. A 85, 016301 (2012) ) with the title "Reply to 'Comment on "Fermionic entanglement ambiguity in noninertial frames" ' ". The article is a reply to both [K. Bradler, (2011), arXiv:1108.5553] and [K. Bradler and R. Jauregui, (2012) ,arXiv:1201.1045] since the contents of the second reference are mostly contained in the first one