Related papers: Correction to "$C_1$ in [2] is zero"

We offer a brief response to the criticisms put forward by Cusin et al in arXiv:1811.03582 about our work arXiv:1810.13435 and arXiv:1806.01718, emphasising that none of these criticisms are relevant to our main results.

In this note the authors have raised the question regarding the validity of the main result in [1] by setting an example.

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors due to an error in the main theorem.

We correct the proof of Theorem 4.1 from [C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Soc. R. Can. \textbf{44} (2022), no. 4, 88--112].

We observe that there is no clash between the works \cite{gar} and \cite{g1}.

This paper has been withdrawn by the author, due to an error in the inequality after the inequality (31).

The purpose of this note is to rectify a typographical error in the statements of Theorems 5.5 and 5.6 of Sharma, Chauhan and Singh[3] and further analyze and discuss the significance of the results derived in Takieldin and Sol\'e [4]. In…

We point out a mistake in the statement of Corollary 2 in R. C. Alperin's paper on Selberg's lemma.

In this note we document a gap in an argument in the above paper, and point to new work in the literature giving a complete proof of the main result.

We correct a small gap found in the authors' paper 'On bounds for the effective differential Nullstellensatz' (J Algebra 449:1-21, 2016). This gap is due to an inequality that does not generally hold. However, under one additional…

This article corrects two mistakes in the article "Coarse homology theories" [math.AT/0106183].

We comment on the Reply of G. Su and M. Suzuki [cond-mat/9808011] to our Comment [cond-mat/9807402] about the papers of G. Su [Phys. Rev. B 54, 8291 (1996)] and G. Su and M. Suzuki [Phys. Rev. B 57, 13367 (1998)]. The algebraic mistake…

An error is identified and corrected in the construction of a non-Z-stable, stably projectionless, simple, nuclear C*-algebra carried out in a paper by the second author.

The claim in \cite{Al-Badawi:2025ipr} that *"the errors in the foundational components (3) and (5) of Ref. [1] invalidate all subsequent analyses, numerical results, and physical interpretations that depend on them"* is **entirely…

A gap in the proof of Theorem 3.5 in the paper ``A new iteration process for approximation of common fixed points for finite families of total asymtotically nonexpansive mappings". Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. vol. 2009,…

The experimental findings reported in our original paper [1] (arXiv:1211.2913) have been criticized in ref.[2] (arXiv:1606.00710). We believe that the arguments brought in ref. [2] are not correct and we show evidence for this.

In this note, the correction to the proof of one theorem in some our previous paper [arXiv:1302.0589] will be given.

In the paper [Hong-Shi Zong, Wei-Min Sun, Phys. Lett. B 640 (2006) 196], the authors claim that our proof of the inconsistency of the ladder approximation to QCD [Phys. Lett. B 611 (2005) 129] was incorrect. However, their claim is based on…

This paper is in response to a recent comment by Bellissard [arXiv:1704.02644] on the paper [Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 130201 (2017)]. It is explained that the issues raised in the comment have already been discussed in the paper and do not…

We obtain a fundamental inequality for a contraction with respect to a $C^*$-algebra valued metric space. As an application of this inequality a simple proof is given for the fixed point theorem in $C^*$-algebra valued metric space.