Related papers: Correction to "$C_1$ in [2] is zero"
A Comment on the Letter by C. F. Qiao and L. Tang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 221601 (2014) [arXiv:1408.3995]
We study inequalities between general integral moduli of continuity of a function and the tail integral of its Fourier transform. We obtain, in particular, a refinement of a result due to D. B. H. Cline [2] (Theorem 1.1 below). We note that…
We present new metric criteria for non-amenability and discuss applications. The main application of the results of this paper is the proof of non-amenability of R.Thompson's group F. This is a continuation of the series of papers on our…
About twenty years ago Johnson and Zippin showed that every separable L_1(mu)-predual was isometric to a quotient of C(Delta ), where Delta is the Cantor set. In this note we will show that the natural analogue of the theorem for…
Statements included in the comment published by Schumann et al. (arXiv:1904.03023v1) are contradicted by documents that were communicated to one of the co-authors of the comment (Dr. Koester). These documents are reviewed but cannot be…
In this paper has been withrawn by the author due the error in the proof of theoem 1.
The paper presents a counterexample to the Hodge conjecture.
We respond to the criticisms of a recent paper of Buchert et al. [arXiv:1505.07800]
The paper referred to in the title is Allard/Almgren 1981 [AA81]. Several months ago Francesco Maggi emailed me saying that the inequalities 5.3(4),(5) of \cite{AA81} were wrong. In fact, as he pointed out, their incorrectness is…
In this paper we correct the errors of Yu.~N.~Kuznetsova's paper on the continuous duality for Moore groups.
In a recent publication [PRL 111, 160405 (2013)] we proved a version of Heisenberg's error-disturbance tradeoff. This result was in apparent contradiction to claims by Ozawa of having refuted these ideas of Heisenberg. In a direct reaction…
This note corrects one serious mistake and several smaller mistakes from arXiv:math/0502404. The main results of that paper are unchanged.
The said paper [2] entitled "Proof Of Two Dimensional Jacobian Conjecture" is with gaps.
The first paper is an invited comment on arXiv:1110.5527 presented at Hypercomplex Seminar 2012 and on sixteen earlier published papers by Zhidong Zhang and Norman H. March. All these works derive from an erroneous solution of the…
This is no longer available.
This paper has been withdrawn, see the replacement arXiv:1302.6670.
Boris Shoikhet noticed that the proof of lemma 1 in section 2.3 of math.QA/0504420 contains an error. In this note I give a correct proof of this lemma which was suggested to me by Dmitry Tamarkin. The correction does not change the results…
Preliminary results from Nathanson [5] are used to prove the Muirhead and Rado inequalities.
This paper was withdrawn by the authors. The mistake in math.AG/0209223 affects also this paper.
In the paper, the occurrence of zeros and ones in the binary expansion of the primes is studied. In particular the statement in the title is established. The proof is unconditional.