Related papers: Comment on Article by Ferreira and Gamerman
We reply to the comment arXiv:quant-ph/0702060 on our letter arXiv:quant-ph/0603120 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 100402 (2006)]
A response to commenter Ke Lan's comment on our paper published in Nature Communications (2023)14:5782 by J. Yan et al
Rejoinder of ``Statistical analysis of an archeological find'' [arXiv:0804.0079]
A comment is given to the reply of Kraemmer and Rebhan (hep-th/9711075) to our paper (hep-th/9710131).
A comment to the paper by S. Chen, H. B\"uttner, and J. Voit, [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 87}, 087205 (2001)].
This is a brief response to a recent posting by Gross.
Comment on ``The 2005 Neyman Lecture: Dynamic Indeterminism in Science'' [arXiv:0808.0620]
Comment on ``The 2005 Neyman Lecture: Dynamic Indeterminism in Science'' [arXiv:0808.0620]
Reply to the preceding comment by Rolf Schilling and Bernhard Schmid [arXiv:1101.5577, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 049601 (2011)].
Comment on paper by Blanchette and Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 144501 (2009).
This reply contains a brief response to the comment by R. Howl, D. R\"atzel, and I. Fuentes [arXiv:1811.10306]
This is the revised version of a Comment on a paper by C. Escudero (Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 116101, 2008; arXiv:0804.1898).
Comment: Expert Elicitation for Reliable System Design [arXiv:0708.0279]
Comment: Expert Elicitation for Reliable System Design [arXiv:0708.0279]
Comment: Expert Elicitation for Reliable System Design [arXiv:0708.0279]
Comment on "Support Vector Machines with Applications" [math.ST/0612817]
Comment on "Support Vector Machines with Applications" [math.ST/0612817]
We respond to the criticism raised in the paper arXiv:1704.07831.
Comment on "Quantifying the Fraction of Missing Information for Hypothesis Testing in Statistical and Genetic Studies" [arXiv:1102.2774]
Comment on "Quantifying the Fraction of Missing Information for Hypothesis Testing in Statistical and Genetic Studies" [arXiv:1102.2774]