Related papers: Comments on Backreaction

Comment on paper "Towards a bulk theory of flexoelectricity" by R.Resta [Phys.Rew. Lett. v. 105, 127601 (2010)]

This is a reply to Professor Yehia Comments in arXiv:1305.0026

After the rejection of their comment [arXiv:cond-mat/0609399v1] to our Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 97}, 100601 (2006), the Authors informed us that an extended version of their comment is going to be published in a different journal under the…

Reinhard Werner authored a comment on my paper "What Bell Did", disputing the conclusion and argumentation of the paper. This is my reply.

We reply to the comment arXiv:quant-ph/0702060 on our letter arXiv:quant-ph/0603120 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 100402 (2006)]

I reply to Professor Peter van Nieuwenhuizen in connection with hep-th/0408137

We reply to David's comment (hep-lat/9504017) on our paper Phys.Rev.Lett. 74(1995)1920.

We respond briefly to the recent comment by Jay Lawrence, Marcin Markiewicz and Marek \'{Z}ukowski [arXiv:2210.09025 and Found. Phys. \textbf{54}, 45 (2024)] regarding our work defending RQM against their previous assessment. We refute the…

Here we give our reply to the comment by Sibirtsev et al on our paper ``Mass and K-Lambda Coupling of the N*(1535)".

We reply to the preceding Comment by E. van Beveren et al., arXiv:0811.2589 [hep-ph].

The authors of preprint arXiv:2009.00286 and paper Appl. Phys. Lett. 117, 130501 (2020), Y. Sivan and Y. Dubi, made several wrong and inconsistent comments on our papers [J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 16616-16631 (2013), ACS Photonics 4 (11),…

Reply to Bernevig, Giuliano, and Laughlin: cond-mat/0410147

We briefly remind references and arguments, already discussed in the past, which confute erroneous claims in arXiv:1210.5501.

Few days ago V.D. Efros submitted a preprint to nucl-th containing criticisms of our recent research activity on bound and scattering states of A=3, 4 nucleons. As a consequence, we are forced to examine the essence of the controversy and…

Comment on ``Microarrays, Empirical Bayes and the Two-Group Model'' [arXiv:0808.0572]

We comment on a recent paper by the LEPS2/BGOegg Collaboration [Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 202501 (2020), arXiv:2005.03449].

To appear in Phys. Rev. Lett. together with the author's Reply.

We refute in this Reply the criticisms made by M. Abdel-Aty [Phys. Rev. A 70, 047801 (2004)]. We show that none of them are founded and we demonstrate very explicitly what is wrong in the arguments developed by this author.

Reply to the Comment by F. Corberi, E. Lipiello and M. Zannetti (cond-mat/0211609).

I respond to the Bernard et al. comment on my letter ``Chiral anomalies and rooted staggered fermions.''