Related papers: Comments on Backreaction
Reply to the recent comment by I.Ispolatov and M.Karttunen, cond-mat/0303564
Comment on Article by Ferreira and Gamerman [arXiv:1509.03410].
Comment on Article by Ferreira and Gamerman [arXiv:1509.03410].
This is a brief response to a recent posting by Gross.
A response to commenter Ke Lan's comment on our paper published in Nature Communications (2023)14:5782 by J. Yan et al
We present here our response to Dikpati et al.'s criticism of our recent solar dynamo model.
We are pleased to see that Jeckelmann has made many changes to the original version of his comment on our paper as a result of our response. Here is a copy of this powerful response that reveals problems in his previous results. However,…
Benenti et al. recently submitted a Comment (arXiv:0912.3667) on our work "Coherent Ratchets in Driven Bose-Einstein condensates". We show that the main claim of the Comment is wrong, and correct some other misunderstandings presented…
We reply to the criticisms of our publication (N. Hasegawa, K. Hagino, and Y. Tanimura, Phys. Lett. B808, 135693 (2020)) made by A. Ono in his recent article, arXiv:2201.02966.
We consider some critical claims concerning our above paper, and reply to these claims.
This is a Comment to the recent review by L. Glozman, hep-ph/0701081
The Comment by Duval et al. [PRL 96, 099701 (2006)] addresses an important, but not the main, result of our Letter [PRL 95, 137204 (2005)]. It does not contradict our results in substance, and the only objection is really on the style of…
This is our formal Reply to revised version (v2) of arXiv: nucl-th/0510004v2.
This note is the follow up to a paper by M. Waldschmidt.
We reply to the recent comment cond-mat/9809184 on our original paper `Non-universal exponents in interface growth', Phys. Rev. Lett, 79, 2261 (1997).
It is shown that criticism of my paper arXiv:0801.0656 Phys. Rev. Lett, vol. 101, 163202 (2008) by the authors of Comment arXiv:0810.3243v1 is wrong and that their main arguments are in contradiction with established concepts of statistical…
The authors of the Comment ascribe us claims never made while moderating their own previous unsubstantiated statements.
This reply contains a brief response to the comment by R. Howl, D. R\"atzel, and I. Fuentes [arXiv:1811.10306]
This is a reply to a comment by P. Schlottmann and A.A. Zvyagin.
We reply to comment on recent paper by Pieplow and Henkel (New J. Phys. 15 (2013) 023027) and our results made by Volokitin and Persson (arXiv: 1405.2525)