Related papers: On the paper "statistical approximation by positiv…
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a mistake in the proof of the main theorem.
In [2] the author claims to provide a counterexample to a result in a recent paper [1]. In this note, we prove that the details of his example is false and this example is compatible with our result in [1] and so is not a countreexample.
Unfortunately the proof of the main result of [1], Theorem 1, has a flaw. Namely, Lemma 13 used in the proof of Proposition 11 is correct only under an additional assumption that the operator $A$ is normal (adjoint for the one-sided shift…
A very short note, explaining the error in the original paper, which renders its central result incorrect.
There is a serious mistake in the proof.
We prove a strong approximation result for the empirical process associated to a stationary sequence of real-valued random variables, under dependence conditions involving only indicators of half lines. This strong approximation result also…
The idea behind Poisson approximation to the binomial distribution was used in [J. de la Cal, F. Luquin, J. Approx. Theory, 68(3), 1992, 322-329] and subsequent papers in order to establish the convergence of suitable sequences of positive…
On [3, p. 199] one says "We mention parenthetically that the proof of [99, Lemma 41.3] is incorrect, and we do not know whether it, [99, Theorem 41.5] and [99, Theorem 41.6] are true". The previously cited reference [99] is our reference…
In this note, it is shown that the results claimed in the paper [1]---as well as the examples presented there---are, unfortunately, incorrect.
In this work, we show that the proof of the main result in [An Application of Hayashi's Inequality for Differentiable Functions, Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 32 (6) (1996), 95--99, by R.P. Agarwal and S.S. Dragomir] was wrong.…
It is shown that the condition of Theorem 1 in [1] never holds in practice and that Theorem 2 is incorrect under the stated condition. Extra assumptions or/and modifications are needed to make the conclusions of Theorem 1 and 2 above valid,…
We present some operator inequalities for positive linear maps that generalize and improve the derived results in some recent years. For instant, if $A$ and $B$ are positive operators and $m,m^{'},M,M^{'}$ are positive real numbers…
In the present paper, an inverse result of approximation, i.e., a saturation theorem for the sampling Kantorovich operators is derived, in the case of uniform approximation for uniformly continuous and bounded functions on the whole real…
Concerning Version 1 of ``Worst-case Nonparametric Bounds for the Student T-statistic'', arXiv:2508.13226: The main result there is incorrect. Concerning Version 2 of arXiv:2508.13226: At least the proof of the main result there is…
This article investigates the convergence properties of s-numbers of certain truncations of bounded linear operators between Banach spaces. We prove a generalized version of a known convergence result for the approximation numbers of…
This paper has been withdrawn due to a crucial error in the proof of the main theorem
This note discusses three examples given in the recent technical correspondence paper [1], which addresses the results presented in [2,3,4]. It is shown that the first example ([1], Section 3) is irrelevant to the results of [2]. The second…
We show that the celebrated 1956 Lax-Richtmyer linear theorem in Numerical Analysis - often called the Fundamental Theorem of Numerical Analysis - is in fact wrong. Here "wrong" does not mean that its statement is false mathematically, but…
This paper has been withdrawn by the author. The statement of the Main Theorem but is wrong in general, there have been provided counterexamples. The main theorem only holds conditionally, under the finiteness statement of theorem 2.8.
In this paper, we give corrected and improved definitions of the sets $S$ and $\Delta$ compared to [1]. By using these new definitions, we go throughout the proof of the main result in [1], and we correct it.