Related papers: What Maudlin replied to
In this brief reply we point out to some misconceptions in C.Camacho's comment (cond-mat/9701210).
This is a reply to Muff, S. et al. (2022) Rewriting results sections in the language of evidence, Trends in Ecology & Evolution 37, 203-210.
This paper replies to the comment by Jefimenko: "Causal equations for electric and magnetic fields and Maxwell's equations: Comment on a paper by Heras" [Am. J. Phys. 76, 101-101 (2008)]."
The correctness of the consistent histories analysis of weakly interacting probes, related to the path of a particle, is maintained against the criticisms in the Comment, and against the alternative approach described there, which receives…
In 1980 Otto G. Ruehr made some puzzling comments that a certain identity A, that he proved, is equivalent to another identity B, but he did not explain why they are equivalent. Recently J.-P. Allouche tried to explain why they are…
This is an English translation of Werner's 1987 dissertation "Kleine Aufl\"osungen spezieller dreidimensionaler Variet\"aten," originally published as Bonner Mathematische Schriften No. 186.
They are possible other cases at first done not contemplate. This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial sign error in equation 1 page 4
A response to a letter to the editor by Schilling regarding Bartroff, Lorden, and Wang ("Optimal and fast confidence intervals for hypergeometric successes" 2022, arXiv:2109.05624)
In P\"otscher and Preinerstorfer (2022) and in the abridged version P\"otscher and Preinerstorfer (2024, published in Econometrica) we have tried to clear up the confusion introduced in Hansen (2022a) and in the earlier versions Hansen…
This is response to the recent comment arXiv:2210.10539v2 by I. Burmistrov.
We comment on a Letter by Vilar and Rubi [arXiv:0704.0761].
The content of this paper is now available as part of arXiv:0802.2019
The Response [J. Chem. Phys. 160, 187102 (2024)] of Inoue and coworkers to my Comment [J. Chem. Phys. 160, 187101 (2024)] on their original paper [J. Chem. Phys. 159, 054105 (2023)] clarifies some points put forward in my Comment, but also…
This essay was invited for publication in Nieuw Archief voor Wiskunde; it will also appear in translation in the SMF Gazette and in the DMV Mitteilungen. I discuss the recent trends in scholarly communication in mathematics, the current…
In this brief note, we first give a counterexample to a theorem in Chernikov and Towsner, arXiv:2510.02420(1). In arXiv:2510.02420(2), the theorem has changed but as we explain the proof has a mistake. The change in the statement, due to…
This paper is a rebuttal to Eur. Phys. Jour. Plus 130, 191 (2015), which claims that the results in arXiv:1502.04911 (Ann. Phys. 355, 360 (2015)) are incorrect. For this reason, some of the results in arXiv:1502.04911 have been reviewed and…
Assertions made in a document recently deposited in the arXiv are refuted.
In this paper dedicated to the memory of Walter Philipp, we formalize the rules of classical$\to$ quantum correspondence and perform a rigorous mathematical analysis of the assumptions in Bell's NO-GO arguments.
We reply to the comment by Ying Zhang and S. Das Sarma on our PRL 94, 226405 (2005).
This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to the version of [A complete proof of Hamilton's conjecture] at arXiv:1008.1576