Related papers: What Maudlin replied to

Over one year ago, a very long preprint posted on arXiv [arXiv:1709.03771] and HAL announced a proof of Lehmer's Conjecture (and of other related results). Unfortunately, as was remarked by several specialists, this proof contains a (at…

A recent Comment by W. T. Kranz is shown to be plagued by a serious mathematical error which makes its conclusions invalid.

We clarify the relationship between the conclusions of the previous Comment of A. Helfer [1] and that of our Brief Report [arXiv:0906.5315]

arXiv admin note: This submission has been withdrawn by arXiv administrators due to unprofessional personal attack.

I provide some comments on Arithmetic Teichmuller Spaces constructed in my paper arXiv:2106.11452.

We reply to the comment arXiv:quant-ph/0702060 on our letter arXiv:quant-ph/0603120 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 100402 (2006)]

Comment on P. Walker, Nature 453 (2008) 864, http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v453/n7197/full/453864a.html

Reply to the recent comment by I.Ispolatov and M.Karttunen, cond-mat/0303564

We briefly remind references and arguments, already discussed in the past, which confute erroneous claims in arXiv:1210.5501.

We reply to recent criticisms of the SIMPLE project by J.I. Collar [arxiv:1106.3559]

There are some points in the reply of Horton et al. [http://stacks.iop.org/JPhysA/35/7963] to my comment [quant-ph/0202140] on their paper [quant-ph/0103114] which I cannot let stand without a response. I provide here some clarification of…

We reply to the preceding Comment by E. van Beveren et al., arXiv:0811.2589 [hep-ph].

We make a few comments on some misleading statements in the above paper.

We report on the life and work of F. Wiener, whom we confused with N. Wiener in a previous article.

In this communication we refute a criticism concerning results of our work [3] that was presented in references [1] and [2].

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors, because it has been made obsolete by the detailed expositions in our papers in arXiv:0812.4885 (the mathematics part) and arXiv:0812.4737 (the economics part).

This is a Reply to the Comment [arXiv:0807.0699] on our paper [PRL 100:232002 (2008)].

This paper has been withdrawn by the authors because it has been combined with "Higher Auslander Algebras Admitting Trivial Maximal Orthogonal Subcategories" (arXiv:0903.0761) together. Please see the new version of the latter paper for the…

Wiseman has claimed that Bell was wrong in stating that determinism was inferred rather than assumed in the summary of the EPR argument in his 1964 paper. The reply of Wiseman and his co-authors to my comment misstates my reasons for…

This article is a reply to the Comment by D. Spemann et al (arXiv:1204.2992) in response to our paper 'Revealing common artifacts due to ferromagnetic inclusions in highly oriented pyrolytic graphite' (EPL, 97 (2012) 47001).