Related papers: Comment on "Classical Mechanics of Nonconservative…

Comment to D. Kaczorowski et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 027003 (2009).

Comment on the computational work [Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 135506 (2004)].

We present a comment on a recent letter by B. Edwards, N.W. Ashcroft, Nature 388 (1997) 652, in which the dielectric instabilty of the phase III of the solid molecular hydrogen system is suggested on the basis of electrostatics.

This letter is my comment about the opinion paper: Transdisciplinary electric power grid science (PNAS, 2013 - http://www.pnas.org/content/110/30/12159.full). [arXiv:1307.7305].

A Reply to the Comment by C. Ciuti and P. Nataf [arXiv:1112.0986v1] on our Letter "Superradiant Phase Transitions and the Standard Description of Circuit QED" [Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 113602 (2011)].

After the rejection of their comment [arXiv:cond-mat/0609399v1] to our Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 97}, 100601 (2006), the Authors informed us that an extended version of their comment is going to be published in a different journal under the…

Reply to a comment on "Infinite-Cluster geometry in central-force networks", PRL 78 (1997), 1480. A discussion about the order of the rigidity percolation transition.

A Comment on the Letter by Atsushi Ikeda and Kunimasa Miyazaki, [arXiv:1003.5472v2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 255704 (2010)].

A Comment on the Letter by E. Shchukin and W. Vogel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 230502 (2005).

Here we reply to the comment by A. F. Volkov, F. S. Bergeret, and K. B. Efetov.

We comment on recent e-print by L. Mardoyan et al. [cond-mat/0609768]

Comment on the paper "Critical State Theory for Nonparallel Flux Line Lattices in Type-II Superconductors" by A. Badia and C. Lopez is presented here.

We regret that PRL did not accept our Reply for publication. We believe that both our Reply and the original paper (Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 135901 (2017)) is sound and correct. We post our reply here and let readers to judge.

In a Comment [Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 029801 (2014)] on our Letter on self-propelled asymmetric particles [Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 198302 (2013); arXiv:1302.5787], Felderhof claims that our theory based on Langevin equations would be…

Comment on T. M. Squires and M. P. Brenner, Phys.Rev.Lett. 85, 4976 (2000)

I comment on a recent preprint "Neutrino Velocity Anomalies: A Resolution without a Revolution" that appeared recently as arXiv:1110.0989 [hep-ph]

This is a Reply to the Comment posted as arXiv:1207.1261.

Comment on paper by Blanchette and Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 144501 (2009).

This is a comment on [G. Knight and R. Klages, Phys. Rev. E 84, 041135 (2011); also available at arXiv:1107.5293v2 [math-ph]].

We reply to P. Forg\'acs, T. Herpay, and P. Kov\'acs (arXiv: 1202.6289).