Related papers: Comment on "Classical Mechanics of Nonconservative…
We reply to David's comment (hep-lat/9504017) on our paper Phys.Rev.Lett. 74(1995)1920.
We make comments on Day {\it et al.}'s [{\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} 104, 075302 (2010)] paper. Our focus is upon the hysteresis loop in Figure 3 of this paper which was not closed.
A comment on the preprint "Towards a quantitative kinetic theory of polar active matter" by T. Ihle, arXiv:1401.8056.
We respond to the comment arXiv:1809.03931 put forward by Li-Han Chen, Zhen Liu, and Jian-Tin Zheng on our work Kiesel, Platt, and Thomale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 126405 (2013). All misunderstandings and misconceptions communicated in the…
A Comment on the Letter by Granger et.al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 135506 (2002).
Comment on the paper "An analytic functional form for characterization and generation of axisymmetric plasma boundaries", PPCF 55 (2013) 095009 by T. C. Luce.
We reply to a Comment on our recently proposed semiclassical theory for systems with spin-orbit interactions.
This is a Comment on Phys.Rev.Lett. 100, 017001 (2008).
A recent e-print (cond-mat/0604532) presented a proposed Comment to Applied Physics Letters on our publication Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 162503 (2006), cond-mat/0603260. Here is our Response. As the proposed Comment has now been rejected by…
In this commentary we try to make clearer the state of the art concerning the relation between mechanical contact interactions and the different notions of stresses. We emphasize the importance of the concept of virtual displacements. Its…
We analyze in great detail the mathematical derivations from the article "Doppler signature in electrodynamic retarded potentials" by Giovanni Perosa, Simone Di Mitri, William A. Barletta, and Fulvio Parmigiani, published in Physics Open…
Originally published as a Supplemental Appendix to Adjoint Equations in Stability Analysis, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 46:493-517 (2014)
The Comment of Openov (PRL 93, 158901 (2004)) on my Physical Review Letter (PRL 92, 120405 (2004)) does not affect the universality of the decoherence mechanism described in the Letter.
Book review of Stochastic Chemical Kinetics. Theory and (Mostly) Systems Biological Applications, P. Erdi, G. Lente. Springer (2014)
A change of axes and notation would improve an otherwise excellent teaching diagram.
Reply to the Comment by L. Berthier and J.-P. Bouchaud, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 059701 (2003), also cond-mat/0209165, on our paper Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 097201 (2002), also cond-mat/0203444
We reply to arXiv:1508.00203 `Comment on "Identifying Functional Thermodynamics in Autonomous Maxwellian Ratchets" (arXiv:1507.01537v2)'.
Paper has been accepted for publication in the Journal f\"ur die reine und Angewandte Mathematik. This version contains the corrections and additional references made in the Galley proofs.
A Comment on the Letter by B. Kraus {\it Phys. Rev. Lett.}{\bf 104}, 020504 (2010).
We comment on the latest paper by M. Silaev [Phys. Rev. B {\bf 99}, 224511 (2019)]