Related papers: Reply to "Comment on Strangeness -2 hypertriton"

The possible identification of Her X-1 with a strange star (Li et al. 1995) is shown to be incorrect.

The paper has been withdrawn due to very low reproducibility. About 100 samples have been made, only 3 samples show the superconducting-like behavior. We think it may be an unlikely result.

We point out that the claim of strong universality in the paper J.Phys. A 44, 015002, arXiv:1011.3321 is incorrect, as it contradicts known rigorous results.

We briefly review superstring theories, highlighting the important concepts, developments, and open problems of the subject.

This paper ("Two-Level Chromophore and Irreversibility", which can be found at arXiv:0804.0086) has been withdrawn by the author due to too many errors and misleading statements. This paper has been superseded by Section 2.11 and Chapter 7…

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to a crucial sign error.

This paper has been withdrawn as the proof of Lemma 4.1 is incomplete.

The paper by Mayoh and Garcia-Garcia [arXiv:1412.0029v1] is entitled "Can disorder really enhance superconductivity?". In our opinion, the answer given by the authors is not satisfactory, and we present the alternative picture. Our reply to…

Withdrawn by arXiv administration because authors have forged affiliations and acknowledgements, and have not adequately responded to charges [hep-th/9912039] of unattributed use of verbatim material.

The correlation between baryon number and strangeness elucidates the nature of strongly interacting matter, such as that formed transiently in high-energy nuclear collisions. This diagnostic can be extracted theoretically from lattice QCD…

Recently, we pointed out the possible inconsistency in the very foundations of the Everett MWI (or a Multiverse) theory. Here, we place some emphasis on the very basic notions underlying our conclusion yet motivated by certain, recently…

This supplementary information contains detailed derivations, comparison to experiment, and discussion of other miscellaneous issues omitted from the main text.

I reply to the four points raised by S. A. Hayward, R. Di Criscienzo, M. Nadalini, L. Vanzo, S. Zerbini (arXiv:0909.2956v1) against my comment (arXiv:0907.2020v1) to their previous article. I maintain my position on the wrongness of their…

We discuss various recent advances on weak forms of the Twin Prime Conjecture.

We show that, contrarily to the claims in [K. Bradler, (2011), arXiv:1108.5553] (and arXiv:1201.1045), the reference [Phys. Rev. A 83, 062323 (2011)] is devoid of flaws or mistakes. We show that the criticism comes from a misunderstanding…

Comment: Struggles with Survey Weighting and Regression Modeling [arXiv:0710.5005]

Comment: Struggles with Survey Weighting and Regression Modeling [arXiv:0710.5005]

Comment: Struggles with Survey Weighting and Regression Modeling [arXiv:0710.5005]

Comment: Struggles with Survey Weighting and Regression Modeling [arXiv:0710.5005]

Comment: Struggles with Survey Weighting and Regression Modeling [arXiv:0710.5005]