Related papers: Erratum to: Lattice point methods for combinatoria…
The purpose of this erratum and addendum is to correct the errors in [1]. It consists of five components: 1. Lemma 7.1 and Proposition 7.2 are wrong and discarded; 2. A new proof of existence $\lambda(\xi)$ in (7.1) without Proposition 7.2;…
This is an erratum to the article: "Computation of maximal projection constants" (J. Funct. Anal., 277). The statement of Lemma 3.1(2) of that paper is incorrect. As a consequence of this the proof of Theorem 1.4 is incomplete. In this…
We encode arbitrary finite impartial combinatorial games in terms of lattice points in rational convex polyhedra. Encodings provided by these \emph{lattice games} can be made particularly efficient for octal games, which we generalize to…
We correct a partial mistake for a metric presented in the article "Lattice constellation and codes from quadratic number fields" [IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 47, No. 4, May. 2001]. We show that the metric defined in the article is not…
Correction for Error estimates for binomial approximations of game options [math.PR/0607123]
This is an erratum to our paper.
This paper provides effective methods for the polyhedral formulation of impartial finite combinatorial games as lattice games. Given a rational strategy for a lattice game, a polynomial time algorithm is presented to decide (i) whether a…
We correct the proofs of the main theorems in our paper "Limit theorems for Betti numbers of random simplicial complexes".
We correct an error in the second part of Theorem 3 of our original paper (arXiv:1512.07161).
We correct a mistake in the paper with the mentioned title and reference: Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 58 (2019), no. 1, 58:21. It corresponds with the preprint arXiv:1712.04727.
We amend the statement of point~(i) in Theorem~1.3 in arxiv:0901.1022 and supply the additional arguments and minor changes for the results that depend on it. We also seize the occasion and generalize to non-finitely generated lattices.
We correct an error in the article "Property (RD) for Hecke pairs".
The purpose of this erratum is to correct a mistake in the proof of Theorem 4.1 of our paper \cite{CF}.
The ``losing positions" of certain combinatorial games constitute linear error detecting and correcting codes. We show that a large class of games that can be cast in the form of *annihilation games*, provides a potentially polynomial…
We prove that the proof of existence of weighted local median order of weighted tournaments is wrong and that the proof of the correct statement which asserts that every digraph obtained from a tournament by deleting a set of arcs incident…
This note corrects conditions in Proposition 3.4 and Theorem 5.2(ii) and comments on imprecisions in Propositions 4.2 and 4.4 in Fissler and Ziegel (2016).
The Annals of Applied Probability 16 (2006) 984--1033 [URL: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aoap/1151592257]
The original versions (1 and 2) of this paper paper contain a fatal error. All my attempts to patch the error have failed. As a service to the community I explain the error in some detail.
We correct one erroneous statement made in our recent paper "Medial axis and singularities".
In this article, we give a counter-example to Lemma 12 of the article "On Operations and Linear Extensions of Well Partially Ordered Sets" by Maciej Malicki and Aleksander Rutkowski.