Related papers: Bayesian Statistics Then and Now

Rejoinder to "The Future of Indirect Evidence" [arXiv:1012.1161]

In a Perspectives article in Science, Bradley Efron concludes that Bayesian calculations cannot be uncritically accepted when using uninformative priors. We argue that this conclusion is problematic because Efron's example does not use…

Brad Efron's paper [arXiv:0808.0572] has inspired a return to the ideas behind Bayes, frequency and empirical Bayes. The latter preferably would not be limited to exchangeable models for the data and hyperparameters. Parallels are revealed…

Discussion of "Statistical Inference: The Big Picture" by R. E. Kass [arXiv:1106.2895]

Discussion of "Harold Jeffreys's Theory of Probability revisited," by Christian Robert, Nicolas Chopin, and Judith Rousseau, for Statistical Science [arXiv:0804.3173]

Familiar statistical tests and estimates are obtained by the direct observation of cases of interest: a clinical trial of a new drug, for instance, will compare the drug's effects on a relevant set of patients and controls. Sometimes,…

Discussion of ``Least angle regression'' by Efron et al. [math.ST/0406456]

Discussion of ``Least angle regression'' by Efron et al. [math.ST/0406456]

Discussion of ``Least angle regression'' by Efron et al. [math.ST/0406456]

Discussion of ``Least angle regression'' by Efron et al. [math.ST/0406456]

Discussion of ``Least angle regression'' by Efron et al. [math.ST/0406456]

Discussion of ``Least angle regression'' by Efron et al. [math.ST/0406456]

Discussion of ``Least angle regression'' by Efron et al. [math.ST/0406456]

Discussion of ``Least angle regression'' by Efron et al. [math.ST/0406456]

Discussion of ``Statistical analysis of an archeological find'' by Andrey Feuerverger [arXiv:0804.0079]

Discussion of "Is Bayes Posterior just Quick and Dirty Confidence?" by D. A. S. Fraser [arXiv:1112.5582].

Discussion of "Is Bayes Posterior just Quick and Dirty Confidence?" by D. A. S. Fraser [arXiv:1112.5582].

Discussion of "Is Bayes Posterior just Quick and Dirty Confidence?" by D. A. S. Fraser [arXiv:1112.5582]

This paper extends the work of Clarke [1] on the Bayesian foundations of the biomagnetic inverse problem. It derives expressions for the expectation and variance of the a posteriori source current probability distribution given a prior…

Rejoinder to "Is Bayes Posterior just Quick and Dirty Confidence?" by D. A. S. Fraser [arXiv:1112.5582]