Related papers: Second comment to "Invariance of the tunneling met…
Benenti et al. recently submitted a Comment (arXiv:0912.3667) on our work "Coherent Ratchets in Driven Bose-Einstein condensates". We show that the main claim of the Comment is wrong, and correct some other misunderstandings presented…
A significant mathematical error is identified and corrected in a recent highly-cited paper on oscillatory flows of second-grade fluids [Fetecau & Fetecau (2005). Int. J. Eng. Sci., 43, 781--789]. The corrected solutions are shown to agree…
We provide here a counter-example to the second inequality of Corollary (19.10) in the Clay Institute Monograph by J.Morgan and G.Tian entitled "Ricci Flow and the Poincare Conjecture". We had announced the existence of this counter-example…
This is a comment on recent paper by T.M. Stace and S.D. Barrett, PRL 92, 136802 (2004). We show that the main result of the paper, absence of the spectral peak for continuous weak measurement of coherent oscillations in a qubit, is…
Reply to Bernevig, Giuliano, and Laughlin: cond-mat/0410147
In addition, our work has text overlap with arXiv:1804.06242, arXiv:1705.00938 by other authors. We want to rewrite this paper for avoiding this fact.
We respond to two sets of criticisms of our analysis in Noack & Niven, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 700, 187--213 (2012), made by Di Vita, Journal of Thermodynamics & Catalysis, 3: e108 (2012). We show that the criticisms are incorrect and…
Recently K. Banaszek, I. A. Walmsley, K. Wodkiewicz (quant-ph/0012097) commented on our Proposal for the Measurement of Bell-Type Correlations from Continuous Variables [T. C. Ralph, W. J. Munro, R. E. S. Polkinghorne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85,…
Comment on Scafetta, Nicola. 'Discussion on Common Errors in Analyzing Sea Level Accelerations, Solar Trends and Global Warming.' arXiv:1305.2812 (May 13, 2013a). doi:10.5194/prp-1-37-2013.
This is a reply to a Comment on 'A test-tube model for rainfall', {\it Europhys. Lett.}, {\bf 106}, 40001, (2014).
This is the Reply to the Comment by E. Thuneberg refuting the paper by E. B.Sonin [Phys. Rev. B 104, 094517 (2021)] as incorrect. The criticism is based on a misunderstanding of the goal and the approach of the paper and does not provide…
In this Comment, we refute conclusions made in Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 233601 (2014) by L.-G. Wang, L. Wang, M. Al-Amri, S.-Y. Zhu, and M. S. Zubairy. These conclusions stem from the use of the linear theory, which is not applicable to…
Fernandez Comment [1] on our pseudo-perturbative shifted-l expansion technique [2,3] is either unfounded or ambiguous.
The Comment criticizes the bifurcation analysis performed in the original paper on a Vlasov equation. This criticism can be traced back to a discrepancy in the definition of the paramagnetic phase. Apart from this discrepancy, there is no…
In a recent publication [PRL 111, 160405 (2013)] we proved a version of Heisenberg's error-disturbance tradeoff. This result was in apparent contradiction to claims by Ozawa of having refuted these ideas of Heisenberg. In a direct reaction…
In this comment we report that a recent paper [Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138, 195 (2023)] contains significant errors, omissions and inaccuracies.
A shortcoming in the authors' interpretation of this beautiful new experiment is pointed out and briefly discussed.
We respond to the criticism raised in the paper arXiv:1704.07831.
We respond to invalid criticism in the recent Comment by Schneider et al. [arXiv:1407.4127v1]
First version: del Barco et al. submitted recently a comment [arXiv:0812.4070] on our latest Phys. Rev. Lett. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 237204 (2008)], claiming three basic mistakes. We show here that their claims are unjustified and based on…