Related papers: Reply to the Comment by S.E. Sebastian and N. Harr…

Reply to the Comment by F. Corberi, E. Lipiello and M. Zannetti (cond-mat/0211609).

The authors of the Comment ascribe us claims never made while moderating their own previous unsubstantiated statements.

Response to Comment by A. Bussmann-Holder (arXiv:0909.3603)

Withdrawn -- a revised version will appear in due course.

All the comments made by Andresen's comments are replied and are shown not to be pertinent. The original discussions [ABE S., Europhys. Lett. 90 (2010) 50004] about the absence of nonextensive statistical mechanics with q-entropies for…

There is no abstract for this review article.

We respond to invalid criticism in the recent Comment by Schneider et al. [arXiv:1407.4127v1]

This paper replies the comments by J. D. Jackson [Am. J. Phys. 75, 844-845 (2007)] and V. Hnizdo [Am. J. Phys. 75, 845-846 (2007)].

This is a brief response to a recent posting by Gross.

The reply is no more necessary since the comment was already withdrawn

This is a reply to a comment by P. Schlottmann and A.A. Zvyagin.

We discuss how the comment by A. Loeb [arXiv:2408.06714] has no bearing on the results of Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 041401 (2024) [arXiv:2405.02389].

No abstract available.

We explain why the objections raised by Golubev et al. in a comment on cond-mat/0111398 are not valid.

No abstract available.

Reply to the recent comment by I.Ispolatov and M.Karttunen, cond-mat/0303564

Reply to the Comment physics/0307134 by A. Helmstetter and D. Sornette

We reply to the comment by Ying Zhang and S. Das Sarma on our PRL 94, 226405 (2005).

The reply by Oughstun et al. [J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 28, 468-469 (2011)] to our comment [J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 28, 450-452 (2011)] on their recently published paper [J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27, 1664-1670 (2010)] is shown to make no response to the main…

We offer a brief response to the criticisms put forward by Cusin et al in arXiv:1811.03582 about our work arXiv:1810.13435 and arXiv:1806.01718, emphasising that none of these criticisms are relevant to our main results.