Related papers: Reply to the Comment by S.E. Sebastian and N. Harr…

This is a Comment to the recent review by L. Glozman, hep-ph/0701081

This paper is in response to a recent comment by Bellissard [arXiv:1704.02644] on the paper [Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 130201 (2017)]. It is explained that the issues raised in the comment have already been discussed in the paper and do not…

This note is the follow up to a paper by M. Waldschmidt.

This is a reply to Professor Yehia Comments in arXiv:1305.0026

Comment on Article by Ferreira and Gamerman [arXiv:1509.03410].

Comment on Article by Ferreira and Gamerman [arXiv:1509.03410].

We observe that there is no clash between the works \cite{gar} and \cite{g1}.

Reply to Bernevig, Giuliano, and Laughlin: cond-mat/0410147

Clement and Noiucer submitted a note {\tt arXiv:2401.16008 [gr-qc]} replying to our criticism {\tt arXiv:2401.10479 [gr-qc]} of their previous submission. We reply to the contents of this note and remark that these authors have not…

This is the authors response to commentaries on the original article H is for Human and How (Not) to Evaluate Qualitative Research in HCI, https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2025.2475743 Commentaries were provided by: Jeffrey Bardzell,…

In this report we've shown that the arguments, which the author of the Comment presents to prove his case, are either wrong or irrelevant.

We provide our reply to the comment by Greiter and Schuricht (cond-mat/0511607).

We reply to the comment (cond-mat/9806125) by Essler, Goehmann and Korepin, and show that their points are unfounded.

Withdrawn by the authors

Lee replies to the comment on "Statistical Mechanics of Non-Abelian Chern-Simons Particles" by C. R. Hagen

This is a reply to a comment on our work recently posted in arXiv. To our knowledge, this comment has not been published anywhere else. We show that the points raised in the comment are invalid

In this note we briefly comment a paper by Itin, Obukhov and Hehl criticising our previous paper. We show that all remarks by our critics are ill conceived or irrelevant to our approach and moreover we provide some pertinent new comments to…

In hep-ph/0404212 Diakonov, Petrov, and Polyakov respond to my recent comments on their 1997 paper, ``Exotic anti-decuplet of baryons: prediction from chiral solitons''. Their responses do not address the basic issues or alter the…

withdrawn by author

This comment is withdrawn