Related papers: Agterberg, Zheng, and Mukherjee Reply

After the rejection of their comment [arXiv:cond-mat/0609399v1] to our Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 97}, 100601 (2006), the Authors informed us that an extended version of their comment is going to be published in a different journal under the…

Response to the Comment by Bellessa (arXiv:cond-mat/0006441).

A simple proof of a key inequality required by the paper's analysis is presented. An introductory section discussing the paper's setup may be helpful to some readers. An alternative statistical analysis is suggested.

These are seven corrigenda to equations in the Lehmer article in American Mathematical Monthly 92 (1985), pp 449--457, partially reproduced in the Apelblat tables of integrals and series.

This is the reply to the comment arXiv:0810.4452 by Kofler, Ursin, Brukner, and Zeilinger.

This is a reply to the comment by Yuan et al. [arXiv:1009.6130v1] on our publication [arXiv:1008.4593].

This is a comment on two recent arXiv postings.

A Comment on the Letter by O. Viehmann, J. von Delft, and F. Marquardt [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 107}, 113602 (2011)].

We reply to misleading claims made in a comment to our work by Birse and McGovern in arXiv:1708.09341.

Comment on paper by A. Zvyagin, Phys. Rev. B 64, R060405 (2001).

A proposed solution to the Riemann Hypothesis

Recently K. Banaszek, I. A. Walmsley, K. Wodkiewicz (quant-ph/0012097) commented on our Proposal for the Measurement of Bell-Type Correlations from Continuous Variables [T. C. Ralph, W. J. Munro, R. E. S. Polkinghorne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85,…

In this Reply we argue that the conclusions derived in Ref. arXiv:1301.1241 are questionable.

I give a comment on arXiv:1802.01804v3 [hep-ph]

The paper is withdrawn by the authors and replaced be an improved and extended version arxiv: 0812.2968

Elementary proofs of Sylvester's, Wolstenholme's, Morley's and Lehmer's congruence theorems

This is a Reply to the Comment by Lydersen et al. [arXiv: 1106.3756v1].

This paper replies to the comment by Jefimenko: "Causal equations for electric and magnetic fields and Maxwell's equations: Comment on a paper by Heras" [Am. J. Phys. 76, 101-101 (2008)]."

We make comments on Gaidarzhy {\it et al.}'s [{\it Phys. Rev. Lett.} 94, 030402 (2005)] letter.

We present an approximation version of the results of D. P. Gupta [ J. of Approx. Theory, 7 (1973), 226-238] A. N. S. Singroura [Proc. Japan Acad., 39 (4) (1963), 208-210] and G. Szeg\"{o} [Math. Z., 25 (1926), 87-115]. Some corollaries and…