Related papers: Agterberg, Zheng, and Mukherjee Reply

This is a reply to an article with the same title in which Kirkpatrick claimed that the considerations I put forward some thirty years ago on quantum mixtures are incorrect. It is shown here that Kirkpatrick's reasoning is erroneous.

Reply to the preceding letter by Chakrabarty et al. [Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, no. 35, E4818-E4820 (2015)].

Revisions: reference added to: G. Gilbert, {\sl Nucl.Phys.} {\bf B328}, 159 (1989)

Sutter et al. have responded to the criticisms we made of their cosmic void catalogue in our recent paper presenting an alternative catalogue (Nadathur & Hotchkiss 2013). Unfortunately, their response contains several statements which are…

This is an open letter that we sent to S. Ilie, G. Soederlind and R.M. Corless in August 2008.

We reply to the comment cond-mat/0008098 by Yang, Sun, and Chang on our paper "Theory of Diluted Magnetic Semiconductor Ferromagnetism", Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5628 (2000).

In this paper, we fix some errors made by Jitman [1] and by Prugsapitak and Jitman [3] while characterizing good integers and $2^{\beta}$-good integers.

Clement and Noiucer submitted a note {\tt arXiv:2401.16008 [gr-qc]} replying to our criticism {\tt arXiv:2401.10479 [gr-qc]} of their previous submission. We reply to the contents of this note and remark that these authors have not…

A comment on the letter by M. Machida and T. Koyama, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 94}, 140401 (2005) and also on the preprint by Y. Kawaguchi and T. Ohmi, cond-mat/0411018.

In this short note, we answer two questions of Chen and Ruzsa negatively and answer a problem of Ma and Chen affirmatively.

We settled a conjecture of Feigin, Wang and Yoshinaga, appeared in the preprint "Integral expressions for derivations of multiarrangements" (arXiv: 2309.01287v2).

Howes et al. Reply to Comment on "Kinetic Simulations of Magnetized Turbulence in Astrophysical Plasmas" arXiv:0711.4355

This note is the follow up to a paper by M. Waldschmidt.

This is a Comment to the recent review by L. Glozman, hep-ph/0701081

Comments on ``A new combination of evidence based on compromise'' by K. Yamada

A Comment on the paper "Conservative Quantum Computing" by M. Ozawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 057902 (2002). The author replies in Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 089802 (2003).

Comment on T.S. van Erp, S. Cuesta-Lopez, J.-G. Hagmann, and M. Peyrard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 218104 (2005) [arXiv: physics/0508094].

Brief response to a Reply [arXiv:1005.2615] on our Comments [arXiv:1005.0838] on XENON100 recent results [arXiv:1005.0380].

The article provides a counterexample to a conjecture by Blocki-Zwonek.

A Comment on the Letter by S. Zelakiewicz et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1942 (2000).