Related papers: Agterberg, Zheng, and Mukherjee Reply
Reply to the preceding comment by Rolf Schilling and Bernhard Schmid [arXiv:1101.5577, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 049601 (2011)].
Response to Comment by A. Bussmann-Holder (arXiv:0909.3603)
This is a reply to a comment by P. Schlottmann and A.A. Zvyagin.
We reply to the comment by Ying Zhang and S. Das Sarma on our PRL 94, 226405 (2005).
Reply to the recent comment by I.Ispolatov and M.Karttunen, cond-mat/0303564
We comment on Z. D. Zhang's Response [arXiv:0812.2330] to our recent Comment [arXiv:0811.3876] addressing the conjectured solution of the three-dimensional Ising model reported in [arXiv:0705.1045].
Reply to the Comment by F. Corberi, E. Lipiello and M. Zannetti (cond-mat/0211609).
This is a reply to Professor Yehia Comments in arXiv:1305.0026
Here we reply to the comment by A. F. Volkov, F. S. Bergeret, and K. B. Efetov.
We respond to invalid criticism in the recent Comment by Schneider et al. [arXiv:1407.4127v1]
This is a reply to the recent comment from Ikeda, Berthier, and Sollich (arXiv:1602.04796) on "Constant stress and pressure rheology of colloidal suspensions", Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 158301 (2015).
Cho and Pak reply to Lamm et al. [hep-th/0007108] comment on "A Convergent Series for the Effective Action of QED" [hep-th/0006057].
In this note we answer the two questions raised by Y.Y Li and L. Nguyen in their note [LN2] below.
Reply to the Comment physics/0307134 by A. Helmstetter and D. Sornette
Reply to Bernevig, Giuliano, and Laughlin: cond-mat/0410147
The authors of the Comment ascribe us claims never made while moderating their own previous unsubstantiated statements.
A reply on the comment of Bertin, Chate, Ginelli, Gregoire, Leonard and Peshkov, arxiv:1404.3950v1, in this special issue.
Comment on Article by Ferreira and Gamerman [arXiv:1509.03410].
Comment on Article by Ferreira and Gamerman [arXiv:1509.03410].
Here we give our reply to the comment by Sibirtsev et al on our paper ``Mass and K-Lambda Coupling of the N*(1535)".