Related papers: Comment: Lancaster Probabilities and Gibbs Samplin…

This paper is a comment to M Wilkinson, EPL 106 (2014) 40001, arXiv:1401.4620 [physics.ao-ph,cond-mat.soft], which draws conclusion from our data that are at variance with our observations.

Comments on the article "Pulsar dynamics: magnetic dipole model revisited".

We survey several results known on sampling in computational geometry.

I expound and defend the ``bare probabilism'' reading of Gibbsian (i.e. mainstream) statistical mechanics, responding to Frigg and Werndl's recent (BJPS 72 (2021), 105-129) plea: ``can somebody please say what Gibbsian statistical mechanics…

The Annals of Applied Probability 16 (2006) 984--1033 [URL: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.aoap/1151592257]

This note is my comment on Glenn Shafer's discussion paper "Testing by betting", together with two online appendices comparing p-values and betting scores.

Comment on ``Wigner phase space description of a Morse oscillator''

Laplace's views on randomness and determinism. The paper was written for "Cahiers rationalistes" and addresses a rather wide audience. It contains large quotations of Laplace, most of them coming from his introduction to the book…

We reply to Tsallis' Comment on our "Nonadditive Entropies Yield Probability Distributions with Biases not Warranted by the Data" which first appeared in PRL.

Rejoinder of ``Statistical analysis of an archeological find'' [arXiv:0804.0079]

Discussion of "Harold Jeffreys's Theory of Probability revisited," by Christian Robert, Nicolas Chopin, and Judith Rousseau, for Statistical Science [arXiv:0804.3173]

Comment on "Classical Simulations Including Electron Correlations for Sequential Double Ionization" [arXiv:1204.3956]

Comment on P. Walker, Nature 453 (2008) 864, http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v453/n7197/full/453864a.html

A few remarks on hep-ph/9612213 are given.

Discussion of ``The Dantzig selector: Statistical estimation when $p$ is much larger than $n$'' [math/0506081]

This is a comment on two recent arXiv postings.

Comment on T.S. van Erp, S. Cuesta-Lopez, J.-G. Hagmann, and M. Peyrard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 218104 (2005) [arXiv: physics/0508094].

Comment on "Indispensable Finite Time Correlations for Fokker-Planck Equations from Time Series Data"

Gibbs random fields play an important role in statistics, however, the resulting likelihood is typically unavailable due to an intractable normalizing constant. Composite likelihoods offer a principled means to construct useful…

Discussion of "The Dantzig selector: Statistical estimation when $p$ is much larger than $n$" [math/0506081]