Related papers: Comment: Understanding OR, PS and DR

Discussion of Overall Objective Priors by James O. Berger, Jose M. Bernardo, Dongchu Sun [arXiv:1504.02689].

Discussion of Overall Objective Priors by James O. Berger, Jose M. Bernardo, Dongchu Sun [arXiv:1504.02689].

Comments on the article "Pulsar dynamics: magnetic dipole model revisited".

Rejoinder to ``Breakdown and groups'' by P. L. Davies and U. Gather [math.ST/0508497]

We briefly remind references and arguments, already discussed in the past, which confute erroneous claims in arXiv:1210.5501.

This is a Reply to the Comment [arXiv:0807.0699] on our paper [PRL 100:232002 (2008)].

This document contains a description of several of my papers, including remarks on history and connection with subsequent work. It also contains some new results and conjectures.

Reply to the Comment physics/0307134 by A. Helmstetter and D. Sornette

This is a survey of some of Erd\H os's work on bases in additive number theory.

This is a Reply to the Comment posted as arXiv:1207.1261.

Comment on K.J Thomas et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 135-138 (1996).

We clarify a number of points raised in [Matias, arXiv:cond-mat/0507471v2 (2005)].

Rejoinder of ``Statistical analysis of an archeological find'' [arXiv:0804.0079]

The content of this paper is now available as part of arXiv:0802.2019

Rejoinder to "The Future of Indirect Evidence" [arXiv:1012.1161]

This is our reply to comment (hep-ph/0206289) on our paper [Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 011601].

This is a brief response to a recent posting by Gross.

These exercises complement my notes "Derived categories, resolutions, and Brown representability".

We comment on Z. D. Zhang's Response [arXiv:0812.2330] to our recent Comment [arXiv:0811.3876] addressing the conjectured solution of the three-dimensional Ising model reported in [arXiv:0705.1045].

Comment: Monitoring Networked Applications With Incremental Quantile Estimation [arXiv:0708.0302]