Related papers: Kliem and Toeroek Reply

Comment on ``Tests of scaling and universality of the distributions of trade size and share volume: Evidence from three distinct markets" by Plerou and Stanley, Phys. Rev. E 76, 046109 (2007)

Comment on a recent paper published in Physical Review Letters by M. C. Wang, S. Qiao, Z. Jiang, S. N. Luo, and J. Qi [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 036601 (2016), arXiv:1511.02994v2].

A comment to the paper by S. Chen, H. B\"uttner, and J. Voit, [Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 87}, 087205 (2001)].

Comment on paper by Blanchette and Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 144501 (2009).

This is a comment on Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 180403 (2007) [arXiv:0704.2162].

Comment on the Letter by M. Franz and Z. Tesanovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. v.87, p.257003 (2001).

Response to comment by Finn et al.

A Comment on the Letter by C. R. Galley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 174301 (2013).

A Comment on the Letter by G. Scarcelli, V. Berardi and Y. Shih, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 063602 (2006).

This paper replies the comment by E. Kapuscik [Am. J. Phys. 77, 754 (2009)]

We reply to a comment by Averin and Korotkov http://uk.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0404549 on Stace and Barrett, PRL 92, 136802 (2004) http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v92/e136802, showing that their specific criticisms are unfounded, and…

This is a comment on Chen et al Letter PRL,100, 232002 (2008).

Review of Stability of Matter in Quantum Mechanics, by Elliott H. Lieb and Robert Seiringer, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010, xv+293 pp, ISBN 978-0-521-19118-0.

A comment on the letter by M. Machida and T. Koyama, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 94}, 140401 (2005) and also on the preprint by Y. Kawaguchi and T. Ohmi, cond-mat/0411018.

Reply to the Comment physics/0307134 by A. Helmstetter and D. Sornette

Comment on "Are financial crashes predictable?", L. Laloux, M. Potters, R. Cont, J.P Aguilar and J.-P. Bouchaud, Europhys. Lett. 45, 1-5 (1999)

We comment on some misunderstandings exhibited in a recent paper by Matolcsi et al. (Gen. Rel. Grav.39 413 (2007)).

Chapter from the book "Astrophysics", p.287-308. Edited by Ibrahim Kucuk, ISBN 978-953-51-0473-5, InTech, March 3, 2012.

We comment on a recent paper [D. Schultz et al, Phys. REv. Lett. 90, 015501 (2003)]. We argue that a highly systematical investigation is needed to determine the most stable structures of both pristine and N-substituted fullerenes.

This is a reply to arXiv:1409.7513 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 138901 (2014)].