Related papers: Kliem and Toeroek Reply
A critique to the article by C.A. Fuchs, N.D. Mermin, and R.Schack, "An introduction to QBism with and application to the locality of quantum mechanics" that appeared in Am. J. Phys. 82 (8), 749-754 (2014)
We are submitting a comment on the paper "Quantum Opacity, the RHIC HBT Puzzle, and the Chiral Phase Transition" by J.G. Cramer, G.A. Miller, J.M.S. Wu and J. Yoon, published in Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 102302 (2005).
A comment on the preprint "Towards a quantitative kinetic theory of polar active matter" by T. Ihle, arXiv:1401.8056.
Reply to the comment by D.N. Aristov and A.G. Yashenkin (cond-mat/9612245) on PRL by Balatsky and Salkola (Phys. Rev. Lett., V76, 2386, (1996), cond-mat/9602034).
Rely to the comment by Doering et al. in Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 259401 (2019)
We comment on the paper "Teleportation with a uniformly accelerated partner" (quant-ph/0302179).
We show that the basic results on the paper referred in the title [J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. v. 35 (2002) 5333-5345], concerning the derivation of the Ermakov invariant from Noether symmetry methods, are not new.
Article to appear in the Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science, Dr. R. A. Meyers (Ed.) (Springer Heidelberg, 2009).
We correct an inaccuracy in a previous article [Auscher, Pascal; Bernicot, Fr\'ed\'eric; Zhao, Jiman. Maximal regularity and Hardy spaces. Collect. Math. 59 (2008), no. 1, 103-127.]
Invited contribution to Annalen der Physik (Expert Opinion).
We reply to the Comment of X. Ji [arXiv:0810.4913] on our paper [PRL 100:232002 (2008)], concerning angular momentum algebra, locality, Lorentz covariance, and measurability of our gauge-invariant description of the spin and orbital angular…
We provide a new simple and transparent proof of the version of Kummer's test given in [Tong, J. (1994). Amer. Math. Monthly. 101(5): 450--452]. Our proof is based on an application of a Hardy--Littlewood Tauberian theorem.
This paper extends the stability calculations carried out for a spherical particle [Eur. Phys. J. B, vol. 37 (2004) or arXiv: cond-mat/0401404] to the case of a cylindrical inclusion.
Here we give further evidences to support our scaling relation described in our previous paper [cond-mat/0006459, Phys. Rev. Lett. Vol.85, pp.1238 (2000)].
Comprehensive review paper on the theory and phenomenology of polarized deep inelastic scattering, to appear in Physics Reports
We investigate problems connected to the stability of the wellknown Poho\v{z}aev obstruction. We generalize results which were obtained in the minimizing setting by Brezis and Nirenberg [2] and more recently in the radial situation by…
Comment on cond-mat/0205390; PRL 90, 026805 (2003)
We comment on the validity of Noether's theorem and on the conclusions of [J. Math. Phys. 61 (2020), no. 11, 113502].
A Comment on the Letter by D. Hemanth Kumar et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 144301 (2004)
Comment on the article by S. Gandolfi et al. Phys.Rev.Letters 118 (2017), 232501; arXiv:1612.01502 [nucl-th]