Related papers: Reply to Comment by J.A.Garcia, arXiv:0705.0143 (t…
It is shown that the criticism presented in the Comment by Galanakis et al \cite{1} on the paper by Efetov et al \cite{2} is irrelevant to the bosonization approach.
Comment on "Gapless Spin-1 Neutral Collective Mode Branch for Graphite" by G. Baskaran and S.A. Jafari [cond-mat/0110022; Physical Review Letters, 89, 016402 (2002)].
This is a short communication in reference to the comments in (arXiv: 1605.05147) of our paper in Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 25, 1650051 (2016). We have tried to answer to the comments or criticism in the paper.
Herein I respond to the criticism and to the complains by Benestad (Pattern Recogn. Phys. 1, 91-92, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/prp-1-91-2013) of Scafetta (Pattern Recogn. Phys. 1, 37-57, 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/prp-1-37-2013)…
We show that Peliti's Comment [arXiv:0808.2855] fails to appreciate basic physical principles and consequently misrepresents both our work as well as the classical work of Gibbs and Tolman.
It is shown that the evidence asserted in the Comment [arXiv:1205.6418] on the chemical composition data published by Carpinteri et al. [Strain 47 (Suppl. 2), 282 (2011)]-that the data "cannot be the result of independent measurements as…
Clement and Noiucer submitted a note {\tt arXiv:2401.16008 [gr-qc]} replying to our criticism {\tt arXiv:2401.10479 [gr-qc]} of their previous submission. We reply to the contents of this note and remark that these authors have not…
In this note we show that Jackson's criticism (hep-ph/0203076) of our work "Necessity of simultaneous co-existence of..." is based on an inexact understanding of the basic assumptions and conclusions of our work.
We clarify a number of points raised in [Matias, arXiv:cond-mat/0507471v2 (2005)].
A comment to the authors' SRF Conference pre-print [1] was submitted by A. Gurevich to the arXiv [2]. In this response, we show that the arguments used in the comment are not valid. [1] arXiv:1309.3239 [2] arXiv:1309.5626
We respond to a Comment [arXiv:1407.6854 (2014)] on our recent Nature paper [Nature, 510, 385 (2014)]. We categorically disprove the arguments provided in arXiv:1407.6854 (2014) and thereby further substantiate the evidence we presented in…
Citation analysis of the scientific literature has been used to study and define disciplinary boundaries, to trace the dissemination of knowledge, and to estimate impact. Co-citation, the frequency with which pairs of publications are…
We reply to the comment of Marinari and Parisi [cond-mat/0002457 v2] on our paper [Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5126 (1999) and cond-mat/9906323]. We show that the data in the comment are affected by strong finite-size corrections. Therefore the…
This paper is a comment to M Wilkinson, EPL 106 (2014) 40001, arXiv:1401.4620 [physics.ao-ph,cond-mat.soft], which draws conclusion from our data that are at variance with our observations.
In this short Comment, the difference in the treatment of the gauge function presented in~\cite{VH1} and work of this author is analyzed. it is shown why some transformation of the gauge function made by Hnizdo and Vaman gives incorrect…
Withdrawn by arXiv administration because the text and equations were plagiarized from chapter 11 of the BaBar Physics Book http://www.slac.stanford.edu/pubs/slacreports/slac-r-504.html See also hep-ph/0304045
This is a Reply to the Comment [arXiv:0807.0699] on our paper [PRL 100:232002 (2008)].
This is the Reply to the revised Comment [Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 139601; arXiv:0810.4791] by Joachim Krug on our paper: C. Escudero, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 116101 (2008); arXiv:0804.1898.
We concur with de Castro's observation that the gauge considerations of our approach are not valid. Nevertheless, except for an error that will be corrected, all of our findings are accurate independent of those considerations.
This is a follow up to a paper by the author where the disjointness relation for (the graphs of) definable functions from ${^\omega \omega}$ to ${^\omega \omega}$ is analyzed. In that paper, for each $a \in {^\omega \omega}$ we defined a…