English

Why Do LLM-based Web Agents Fail? A Hierarchical Planning Perspective

Artificial Intelligence 2026-04-29 v2 Computation and Language

Abstract

Large language model (LLM) web agents are increasingly used for web navigation but remain far from human reliability on realistic, long-horizon tasks. Existing evaluations focus primarily on end-to-end success, offering limited insight into where failures arise. We propose a hierarchical planning framework to analyze web agents across three layers (i.e., high-level planning, low-level execution, and replanning), enabling process-based evaluation of reasoning, grounding, and recovery. Our experiments show that structured Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL) plans produce more concise and goal-directed strategies than natural language (NL) plans, but low-level execution remains the dominant bottleneck. These results indicate that improving perceptual grounding and adaptive control, not only high-level reasoning, is critical for achieving human-level reliability. This hierarchical perspective provides a principled foundation for diagnosing and advancing LLM web agents.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2603.14248,
  title  = {Why Do LLM-based Web Agents Fail? A Hierarchical Planning Perspective},
  author = {Mohamed Aghzal and Gregory J. Stein and Ziyu Yao},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.14248},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

Accepted to The 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) 2026

R2 v1 2026-07-01T11:20:32.709Z