English

When Tracking Fails: Analyzing Failure Modes of SAM2 for Point-Based Tracking in Surgical Videos

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2025-10-03 v1 Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Video object segmentation (VOS) models such as SAM2 offer promising zero-shot tracking capabilities for surgical videos using minimal user input. Among the available input types, point-based tracking offers an efficient and low-cost alternative, yet its reliability and failure cases in complex surgical environments are not well understood. In this work, we systematically analyze the failure modes of point-based tracking in laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos. Focusing on three surgical targets, the gallbladder, grasper, and L-hook electrocautery, we compare the performance of point-based tracking with segmentation mask initialization. Our results show that point-based tracking is competitive for surgical tools but consistently underperforms for anatomical targets, where tissue similarity and ambiguous boundaries lead to failure. Through qualitative analysis, we reveal key factors influencing tracking outcomes and provide several actionable recommendations for selecting and placing tracking points to improve performance in surgical video analysis.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2510.02100,
  title  = {When Tracking Fails: Analyzing Failure Modes of SAM2 for Point-Based Tracking in Surgical Videos},
  author = {Woowon Jang and Jiwon Im and Juseung Choi and Niki Rashidian and Wesley De Neve and Utku Ozbulak},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.02100},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

Accepted for publication in the 28th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) Workshop on Collaborative Intelligence and Autonomy in Image-guided Surgery (COLAS), 2025