English

When is the growth index constant?

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics 2017-03-31 v4 General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

Abstract

The growth index γ\gamma is an interesting tool to assess the phenomenology of dark energy (DE) models, in particular of those beyond general relativity (GR). We investigate the possibility for DE models to allow for a constant γ\gamma during the entire matter and DE dominated stages. It is shown that if DE is described by quintessence (a scalar field minimally coupled to gravity), this behaviour of γ\gamma is excluded either because it would require a transition to a phantom behaviour at some finite moment of time, or, in the case of tracking DE at the matter dominated stage, because the relative matter density Ωm\Omega_m appears to be too small. An infinite number of solutions, with Ωm\Omega_m and γ\gamma both constant, are found with wDE=0w_{DE}=0 corresponding to Einstein-de Sitter universes. For all modified gravity DE models satisfying GeffGG_{\rm eff}\ge G, among them the f(R)f(R) DE models suggested in the literature, the condition to have a constant wDEw_{DE} is strongly violated at the present epoch. In contrast, DE tracking dust-like matter deep in the matter era, but with Ωm<1\Omega_m <1, requires Geff>GG_{\rm eff} > G and an example is given using scalar-tensor gravity for a range of admissible values of γ\gamma. For constant wDEw_{DE} inside GR, departure from a quasi-constant value is limited until today. Even a large variation of wDEw_{DE} may not result in a clear signature in the change of γ\gamma. The change however is substantial in the future and the asymptotic value of γ\gamma is found while its slope with respect to Ωm\Omega_m (and with respect to zz) diverges and tends to -\infty.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1610.00363,
  title  = {When is the growth index constant?},
  author = {David Polarski and Alexei A. Starobinsky and Hector Giacomini},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.00363},
  year   = {2017}
}

Comments

16 pages, 5 figure; incorrect reference corrected; v3 matches published version in JCAP; v4: comment added and expanded references

R2 v1 2026-06-22T16:08:15.153Z