English

Can dark energy explain a high growth index?

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics 2025-09-10 v2

Abstract

A promising way to test the physics of the accelerated expansion of the Universe is by studying the growth rate of matter fluctuations, which can be parametrized by the matter energy density parameter to the power γ\gamma, the so-called growth index. It is well-known that the Λ\LambdaCDM cosmology predicts γ=0.55\gamma=0.55. However, using observational data, Nguyen et al. (2023) measured a much higher γ=0.6330.024+0.025\gamma=0.633^{+0.025}_{-0.024}, excluding the Λ\LambdaCDM value within 3.7σ3.7\sigma. In this work, we analyze whether Dark Energy (DE) with the Equation of State (EoS) parameter described by the CPL parametrization can significantly modify γ\gamma with respect to the predicted Λ\LambdaCDM one. Besides the usual Smooth DE (SDE) scenario, where DE perturbations are neglected on small scales, we also consider the case of Clustering Dark Energy (CDE), which has more potential to impact the growth of matter perturbations. In order to minimally constrain the background evolution and assess the largest meaningful γ\gamma distribution, we use data from 3232 Cosmic Chronometers, H(zH(z), data points. In this context, we found that both SDE and CDE models described by the CPL parametrization have almost negligible probability of providing γ>0.6\gamma>0.6. However, given that the measured γ\gamma value assumes the Λ\LambdaCDM background, a direct statistical measure of the incompatibility between theory and the measured value can not be done for other backgrounds. Thus, we devise a method in order to make a quick estimation of the γ\gamma constraints for CPL background. This method indicates that, when using DESI DR2 BAO data to constrain background parameters, no significant changes in the γ\gamma central value and uncertainty is observed. (Abridged)

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2411.00963,
  title  = {Can dark energy explain a high growth index?},
  author = {Ícaro B. S. Cortês and Ronaldo C. Batista},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.00963},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

13 pages, 10 figures, matches the PRD version