English

Upper Bound for Palindromic and Factor Complexity of Rich Words

Combinatorics 2021-01-21 v2

Abstract

A finite word ww of length nn contains at most n+1n+1 distinct palindromic factors. If the bound n+1n+1 is attained, the word ww is called rich. An infinite word ww is called rich if every finite factor of ww is rich. Let ww be a word (finite or infinite) over an alphabet with q>1q>1 letters, let F(w,n)F(w,n) be the set of factors of length nn of the word ww, and let Fp(w,n)F(w,n)F_p(w,n)\subseteq F(w,n) be the set of palindromic factors of length nn of the word ww. We present several upper bounds for F(w,n)| F(w,n)| and Fp(w,n)| F_p(w,n)|, where ww is a rich word. In particular we show that F(w,n)(q+1)8n2(8q10n)log22n+q\mbox.| F(w,n)| \leq (q+1)8n^2(8q^{10}n)^{\log_2{2n}}+q\mbox{.} In 2007, Bal{\'a}{\v z}i, Mas{\'a}kov{\'a}, and Pelantov{\'a} showed that Fp(w,n)+Fp(w,n+1)F(w,n+1)F(w,n)+2\mbox,| F_p(w,n)| +| F_p(w,n+1)| \leq | F(w,n+1)|-| F(w,n)|+2\mbox{,} where ww is an infinite word whose set of factors is closed under reversal. We generalize this inequality for finite words.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1810.03573,
  title  = {Upper Bound for Palindromic and Factor Complexity of Rich Words},
  author = {Josef Rukavicka},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.03573},
  year   = {2021}
}