English

Unveiling $\nu$ secrets with cosmological data: neutrino masses and mass hierarchy

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics 2018-12-13 v2 High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

Abstract

Using some of the latest cosmological datasets publicly available, we derive the strongest bounds in the literature on the sum of the three active neutrino masses, MνM_\nu, within the assumption of a background flat Λ\LambdaCDM cosmology. In the most conservative scheme, combining Planck cosmic microwave background (CMB) temperature anisotropies and baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) data, as well as the up-to-date constraint on the optical depth to reionization (τ\tau), the tightest 95%95\% confidence level (C.L.) upper bound we find is Mν<0.151M_\nu<0.151~eV. The addition of Planck high-\ell polarization data, which however might still be contaminated by systematics, further tightens the bound to Mν<0.118M_\nu<0.118~eV. A proper model comparison treatment shows that the two aforementioned combinations disfavor the IH at 64%\sim 64\%~C.L. and 71%\sim 71\%~C.L. respectively. In addition, we compare the constraining power of measurements of the full-shape galaxy power spectrum versus the BAO signature, from the BOSS survey. Even though the latest BOSS full shape measurements cover a larger volume and benefit from smaller error bars compared to previous similar measurements, the analysis method commonly adopted results in their constraining power still being less powerful than that of the extracted BAO signal. Our work uses only cosmological data; imposing the constraint Mν>0.06eVM_\nu>0.06\,{\rm eV} from oscillations data would raise the quoted upper bounds by O(0.1σ){\cal O}(0.1\sigma) and would not affect our conclusions.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1701.08172,
  title  = {Unveiling $\nu$ secrets with cosmological data: neutrino masses and mass hierarchy},
  author = {Sunny Vagnozzi and Elena Giusarma and Olga Mena and Katherine Freese and Martina Gerbino and Shirley Ho and Massimiliano Lattanzi},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.08172},
  year   = {2018}
}

Comments

Accepted for publication in PRD. Major structural changes from V1, some discussions moved to appendices, but conclusions completely unchanged. 27 pages, 7 figures. Comments are very welcome