English

Threshold expansion of the three-particle quantization condition

High Energy Physics - Lattice 2017-08-09 v3

Abstract

We recently derived a quantization condition for the energy of three relativistic particles in a cubic box. Here we use this condition to study the energy level closest to the three-particle threshold when the total three-momentum vanishes. We expand this energy in powers of 1/L1/L, where LL is the linear extent of the finite volume. The expansion begins at O(1/L3){\cal O}(1/L^3), and we determine the coefficients of the terms through O(1/L6){\cal O}(1/L^6). As is also the case for the two-particle threshold energy, the 1/L31/L^3, 1/L41/L^4 and 1/L51/L^5 coefficients depend only on the two-particle scattering length aa. These can be compared to previous results obtained using nonrelativistic quantum mechanics and we find complete agreement. The 1/L61/L^6 coefficients depend additionally on the two-particle effective range rr (just as in the two-particle case) and on a suitably defined threshold three-particle scattering amplitude (a new feature for three particles). A second new feature in the three-particle case is that logarithmic dependence on LL appears at O(1/L6)\mathcal O(1/L^6). Relativistic effects enter at this order, and the only comparison possible with the nonrelativistic result is for the coefficient of the logarithm, where we again find agreement. For a more thorough check of the 1/L61/L^6 result, and thus of the quantization condition, we also compare to a perturbative calculation of the threshold energy in relativistic λϕ4\lambda \phi^4 theory, which we have recently presented. Here all terms can be compared and we find full agreement.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1602.00324,
  title  = {Threshold expansion of the three-particle quantization condition},
  author = {Maxwell T. Hansen and Stephen R. Sharpe},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.00324},
  year   = {2017}
}

Comments

30 pages, 2 figures, v3: Journal version + erratum: A mistake was corrected that affects the value of the 1/L^6 term in the threshold expansion. The issue was discovered in a fourth-order \lambda \phi^4 theory calculation, presented in arXiv:1707.04279, that was performed to further check the results of this work. Equations (126), (127), (135) and (136) have been modified to correct the mistake

R2 v1 2026-06-22T12:40:26.482Z